User talk:Kazrok4545: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Text replacement - "Test Wiki:Request permissions" to "Test Wiki:Request for permissions"
m (Sorry for the notification.)
m (Text replacement - "Test Wiki:Request permissions" to "Test Wiki:Request for permissions")
Line 17: Line 17:
Hi Kazrok4545,
Hi Kazrok4545,


While I ''can'' appreciate your good-faith wanting to help [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewards]] here in regards to user conduct, and [[User:Piccadilly|Seiyena]] ''does'' need guidance, the prior practice of blocking indefinitely and repeatedly blocking the [[w:WP:SOCK|sockpuppets]] was ''not'' working, and the user ''is'' making progress, demonstrating [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]], and incremental ''capacity to learn''. In addition, as it was quite clear at [[Test Wiki:Request permissions]], Seiyena was being managed by Stewards, and I would've supported you revoking their bureaucrat bit, the blocks were steps too far. Likewise, if you'd offered to assist [[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] with setting up an abuse filter I was about to ask him to set up here, that would also have been fine. As such, though I normally prefer to ''warn'' first before temporarily revoking rights, in this case, I felt a slightly firmer hand was needed here, and have {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/30514|revoked]]}} your <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> and [[Test Wiki:Administrators|sysop]]</code> bits for '''two (2) weeks''' from today, after which any <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> ''may'' re-add it.
While I ''can'' appreciate your good-faith wanting to help [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewards]] here in regards to user conduct, and [[User:Piccadilly|Seiyena]] ''does'' need guidance, the prior practice of blocking indefinitely and repeatedly blocking the [[w:WP:SOCK|sockpuppets]] was ''not'' working, and the user ''is'' making progress, demonstrating [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]], and incremental ''capacity to learn''. In addition, as it was quite clear at [[Test Wiki:Request for permissions]], Seiyena was being managed by Stewards, and I would've supported you revoking their bureaucrat bit, the blocks were steps too far. Likewise, if you'd offered to assist [[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] with setting up an abuse filter I was about to ask him to set up here, that would also have been fine. As such, though I normally prefer to ''warn'' first before temporarily revoking rights, in this case, I felt a slightly firmer hand was needed here, and have {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/30514|revoked]]}} your <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> and [[Test Wiki:Administrators|sysop]]</code> bits for '''two (2) weeks''' from today, after which any <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> ''may'' re-add it.


Thank you again for your other constructive contributions here. :)
Thank you again for your other constructive contributions here. :)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu