Test Wiki:Community portal/Archive 6: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
standardization of 50 sections per archive page (in continuity with RfP archives) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive}} |
{{Archive}} |
||
==Request for edit== |
|||
== Rename request == |
|||
Please mark on the [[MediaWiki:Gadget-MassRollback.js]] gadget page (using a comment (<code>//</code>) at the top of the script), that I am its author. User Xaloria copied my script from PTW ([https://publictestwiki.com/wiki/Gadget:MassRollback]) without my knowledge. Although it is not protected by copyright, I would like to be listed as the author :). Ping for recently active IA: @[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]], @[[User:Bhairava7|Kiteretsu]], @[[User:TheAstorPastor|TheAstorPastor]]. Best regards, [[User:BZPN|BZPN]] ([[User talk:BZPN|talk]]) 18:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Could a steward please rename me into ''CrazyFisherman''? Thanks. --[[User:CrazyFisherman|Morneo06]] ([[User talk:CrazyFisherman|talk]]) 23:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:CrazyFisherman|Morneo06]] Do you intend to use the username '''CrazyFisherman''' for the long-term, and is this part of a synchronization of your username across other wiki farms/wikis? [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 21:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes, I entend to use it for a long term but it is not part of any synchronization. --[[User:CrazyFisherman|Morneo06]] ([[User talk:CrazyFisherman|talk]]) 07:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:::Okay, sounds good. I'll ping MacFan4000. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 21:12, 2 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{Done}} [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 22:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for the notification! This will be done. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 18:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Question == |
|||
:{{done}}. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 19:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank you! [[User:BZPN|BZPN]] ([[User talk:BZPN|talk]]) 19:02, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{section resolved|1=<span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 11:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
==CentralAuth== |
|||
Hi, I have a question. Templates [[Template:Citation Style documentation/agency|like this]] are necessary? They are not used on any page, as this is not Wikipedia. It seems to me that the appropriate thing would be to delete these types of templates. What do you think? [[User:LocoSalas|'''''LOCO''''']] <small>[[User talk:LocoSalas|🔥]]</small> 07:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:They are orphaned, if nobody opposes, feel free to delete the templates. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Ronja</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Ronjapatch|u]] • [[User talk:Ronjapatch|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ronjapatch|c]])''</small> 10:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
::Per Justarandomamerican, this is {{Not done}}. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 02:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
I've suggested it in the past (I think), and I'm gonna suggest it again, but creating a second wiki, maybe testwikibeta or something, and having centralauth would allow for a lot more testing, and I think it would be good, I've looked into it and CA isn't *incredibly* hard to install, so I think it's possible. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 18:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I mean in all honesty I think it would be cool to eventually add a couple more wikis onto the site for testing and writing some content. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 18:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Can my name be changed please? == |
|||
::ZB, though this would be nice, neither MacFan nor I have the technical expertise to install the extension. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 18:50, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]], there's a guide for installing createwiki/managewiki that a mirahezian wrote, which also covers installing CentralAuth [https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Waki285/Install_CreateWiki_and_ManageWiki_on_your_wiki here], and I've done it before and am happy to provide assistance should problems occur. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 20:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{not done|Rejected}} for not being necessary and consuming too much time. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 21:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::@[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] -- re not being necessary, I think it would be good for adding testing, and re taking too much time, it takes about 30 minutes, the majority of work is in localsettings.php, and wouldn't take longer than an hour or two to complete at most. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 06:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::This would have been helpful if TestWiki was hosting one or more TestWikis, but there is only one.. So, why do we need to add CentralAuth for a single TestWiki, I don't think it can be of any use to TestWiki and we should not try to make TestWiki a Wikipedia.Happy testing!---''<span style="background:#7B68EE;border:1px solid #FF00FF;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FFD700">kítєrєtѕu</span>]]•[[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#00FA9A">[@píng mє]</span>]]</span>'' 16:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::@[[User:Bhairava7|Kiteretsu]], my point is we could either branch out and provide other wikis, or create a second wiki for testing CentralAuth. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 17:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::I'm opposed to this idea, one test wiki is good enough and as mentioned on discord centrelauth would be restricted which will make it untestable to users. [[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 19:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::Just stopping by to lay out my thoughts on this: |
|||
:::::::::TestWiki should be committed to providing the best place to test the most amount of MediaWiki tools possible. Central Auth is a pretty integral part of many large Wikis and farms. Hence, allowing users to test its functions would be useful. |
|||
:::::::::I have heard some good points though: We don’t have a second wiki, it’s unneeded, it’s hard to install, etc. |
|||
:::::::::I would personally suggest that, if we were to implement this concept, that we could create a second wiki that is completely locked from editing, with a home page that describes its purpose is to simply be a second wiki for Central Auth testing. |
|||
:::::::::I don’t quite understand the logic of it being unnecessary. If we can provide a place to test tools other testwikis don’t have, that’s a huge positive. I do, however, understand the technical issue of actually installing it. Our two current SAs don’t have the time or ability to install it and I doubt they would be willing to allow a non-system admin install it. |
|||
:::::::::So in conclusion: If it is technically feasible, I {{s}}. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 19:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::Re the second wiki, it could be used as beta for testing extensions before deploying them to prod. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 19:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Hi. Points taken. However, there isn't anything to test in CA that wouldn't have to be restricted to Stewards beyond simply viewing local accounts. As such, this is {{not done|rejected}}. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::@[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] I am sorry, but @[[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] is the global system administrator for Miraheze and a third-party SA for Wikimedia, so I am confused as to why MacFan4000 isn't capable of doing so. [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 09:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::My mistake! MacFan has said in the past on phabricator that he doesn't have the expertise to do so, so I assumed that was also the case today. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 10:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.''</div> |
|||
==Tailsultimatefan3891's sockpuppets== |
|||
I'd like my name here to be changed to Seiyena please. Thank you! [[User:Piccadilly|Fiona]] ([[User talk:Piccadilly|talk]]) 01:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Considering that Tailsultimatefan3891 has now been unblocked for a while, should I remove all of the sockpuppets from [[:Category:Test Wiki sockpuppets of Tailsultimatefan3891|this category]] and have them unblocked as well? [[User:Renamed user 159304387|Tsukushi]] ([[User talk:Renamed user 159304387|talk]]) 06:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't see why we would unblock sockpuppets, but keeping the main unblocked seems fine. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 12:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Done}} [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 17:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
==Require 2FA for highly privileged groups== |
|||
== Adding Archive Header to [[Test Wiki:Request for permissions]] == |
|||
{{atop |
|||
| status = |
|||
| result = {{Not done|Not done}} as there is no consensus to require 2FA on highly privileged groups at this time. [[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] 🤔 [[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0A16A5">''Talk''</span>]] 21:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
Hello all, Currently i added an Archive Header for all archived Pages Current Version of [[User:Sakura emad/header|/header]], Posted to just let you know for censuses. Thank you [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 11:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
just need some help with Main Page button cuz it does not work properly |
|||
:and i can't fix it for now thank you [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 12:21, 26 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::{{done}} [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh]] ([[User talk:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|talk]]) 17:21, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
I'm proposing that we should require 2FA for Interface Admin, Steward and Sysadmin group members as security precautions, as IAs can edit pages that would allow them privilege escalation, and stewards/sysadmins can give such permissions out which could cause issues if their accounts were compromised. Additionally, I think bots with admin/iadmin perms should have 2FA required as they are probably less monitored security wise. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 10:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Restriction of Administrator rights == |
|||
:& it should probably be required for AFAs [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 10:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hello everyone |
|||
:{{o}}: We haven’t had any issues with accounts with elevated permissions being compromised. If the community trusts them to hold the permissions, than they can also be trusted to make sure their account is secure. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 11:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I want to explain something important to the community, it's about verification and Users who should or shouldn't have the right of admin, as for testing we already know this is a Test wiki where you can Test administrator actions, I would like to ask should we recklessly give Admin and bureaucrat right to anyone without confirming if they're Known users on Wikipedia?, I think we should ask them to confirm their account on Meta to know whether they get to benefit from using MediaWiki Tools or just for Fun. |
|||
:{{o}}: I don't see a reason to add it since the rate of accounts being compromised has been vary low --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 14:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
what do you think? |
|||
:{{oppose}} There hasn't been a case where an account was compromised, so I don't see any reason to make 2FA mandatory [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 16:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
==Name Change Request== |
|||
:Thanks [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 17:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Hi, can my name please be changed to Skiyomi? (to match my Wikimedia name) Thank you! [[User:Piccadilly|Piccadilly]] ([[Special:Contribs/Piccadilly|<span style="color:red">My Contribs</span>]] | [[User talk:Piccadilly|<span style="color:#0080ff">My Messages</span>]]) 19:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{comment}}This issue may be against of privacy, while I'd like to say some of them may not be really well-famed Wikipedia users.[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) |
|||
:: {{comment|Reply}} i am not saying we should not give i am saying we just have to install the verification level to know about the Person we give those Rights, Because we don't know if the User is Vandal or Constructive, my Request is nothing but installing a level of verifiably that shows user's Account on Meta or other websites account. [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 14:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{comment|Reply}} Even though they may be LTAs on metawiki or cross-wiki, you couldn't said they aren't come here for learning how to build castles in sandboxs as students. And some of them really don't want other known their account on Meta, for several reasons.[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 00:09, 29 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{comment|Reply}} ok let's hear other's opinion about that, thank you for the interest {{emoji|1F60A|size=28}} [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 01:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
I don't think it is necessary or has any advantages to ask for meta confirmation. There was a proposal about restricting bureaucrat rights some months ago which wasn't successful. –[[User:CrazyFisherman|CrazyFisherman]] ([[User talk:CrazyFisherman|talk]]) 22:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|千村狐免}},please take a look of this change. |
|||
::{{ping|千村狐免}},please take a look of this change. |
|||
[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 10:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|Pavlov2}}What?--[[User:千村狐免|<span style='font-weight:bold;font-family:"Lucida Console";color:#990033;'>千<i>村</i>狐免</span>]][[User talk:千村狐免|<sup style='font-weight:bold;color:#000;'> msg</sup>]] 12:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:{{comment}}I don't think the administrator's authority should be restricted, even if it is the long-term abuse of meta-wiki or cross-wiki.--[[User:千村狐免|<span style='font-weight:bold;font-family:"Lucida Console";color:#990033;'>千<i>村</i>狐免</span>]][[User talk:千村狐免|<sup style='font-weight:bold;color:#000;'> msg</sup>]] 12:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: discussion closed i withdraw.[[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 12:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:Going to go ahead and mark this as {{not done}}. Renaming would cause additional confusion, especially given the extraordinary circumstances that apply to you. Additionally, you [[Test Wiki:Community portal/Archive 4#Rename Request: Piccadilly to Fullegente|requested a rename in March]] saying "This will be my last rename request here." [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 19:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Request Desysopped for Kapol1234 and a checkuser for sockpuppets == |
|||
::I can understand the concern about confusion, and I do accept this decision. But what "extraordinary circumstances" do you mean? [[User:Piccadilly|Piccadilly]] ([[Special:Contribs/Piccadilly|<span style="color:red">My Contribs</span>]] | [[User talk:Piccadilly|<span style="color:#0080ff">My Messages</span>]]) 20:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Your history as an LTA and no warning (straight block) upon abuse. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 22:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==RFC: Remove Inactivity Clause== |
|||
USER:Kapol1234 misused his administrator tools and blocked me wrongly said I'm using sockpuppets. But I can make a promise that these account such as Pavlov3 and MCC214 is definitely not controlled by me. Thus I came here to request for a desysopped for Kapol1234 and a check user between This account, Pavlov3, MCC214 and Kapol1234 himself.{{ping|MacFan4000}} |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 08:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
::{{done}} More than three weeks have passed since the discussion began.With three votes in support and only one in opposition, I am closing this discussion and removing the clause from the policy. [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 10:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
The current [[Test Wiki: Inactivity policy| Inactivity policy]] states that "These [Steward or system administrator] rights may be restored within 1 hour of them being removed; otherwise, a reconfirmation vote will be held." |
|||
If a user holding this level of advanced permissions has been inactive for six months, a one hour request-back, without community input, does not make a lot of sense. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 19:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{ping|MacFan4000}}, In addition, I will be appreciate if you or other Steward could take a look of Kapol1234's log of using administrator tools. Much thanks.[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 08:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{ping|Sakura emad}}[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 08:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
===Discussion=== |
|||
These sockpuppets is not controlled by me , and l think it is controlled by Pavlov2 , because he had using sockpuppets before in Uncyclopedia , lf you check the sockpuppets and my account , please check Pavlov2 same.[[User:Kapol1234|Kapol1234]] ([[User talk:Kapol1234|talk]]) 09:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC){{ping|Sakura emad}}{{ping|MacFan4000}} {{unsigned|kapol1234| 09:38, 11 October 2021}} |
|||
*{{s}} as requester. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 19:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Just a clarification: I am proposing removing the clause completely; they would have to re-RfS. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 00:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{comment}} instead of a one-hour reconfirmation request, does one who lose their advanced permission must run through another community vote? [[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] 🤔 [[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0A16A5">''Talk''</span>]] 15:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:I think they should if they want to regain their rights [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 15:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{o}} 1 hour is a bit short, but I feel 24 hours is more reasonable. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 15:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Not sure you understand the purpose of this request. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 00:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I do, I feel that if you've been inactive, within 24 hours it's perfectly reasonable to request them back. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 08:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{Support}}, agree with proposal. [[User:BZPN|BZPN]] ([[User talk:BZPN|talk]]) 16:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*I guess one hour makes no sense, due to the fact that no one can be 24/7 online. That's why I {{s}} this request. --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 17:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] --> |
|||
i have no technical abilities to check any user's information. [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 13:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
==Rename request== |
|||
{{ping|Kapol1234}}You should participate in the steward election to obtain Check user rights.--[[User:千村狐免|<span style='font-weight:bold;font-family:"Lucida Console";color:#990033;'>千<i>村</i>狐免</span>]][[User talk:千村狐免|<sup style='font-weight:bold;color:#000;'> msg</sup>]] 12:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Please change my username and my bot ([[User:PB08-bot|PB08-bot]]) to Bosco and Bosco-bot respectively, thanks. [[User:Bosco|PB2008]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 12:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
This discussion is closed,because the proposal is invalid.--[[User:千村狐免|<span style='font-weight:bold;font-family:"Lucida Console";color:#990033;'>千<i>村</i>狐免</span>]][[User talk:千村狐免|<sup style='font-weight:bold;color:#000;'> msg</sup>]] 12:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:This is now {{on hold}} awaiting Steward decision - you should receive a response soon. [[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]]) 16:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::{{done}}. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 17:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{section resolved|1=<span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 11:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Internal error== |
|||
{{reply|千村狐免}},perhaps not as you said. The Check user rights may be held by Kapol1234 but without check user and said they are my sockpuppets and blocked me may seem as a misuse of administrator tools. For example, a sockpuppet [[User:MCC214]] leaves an attack message even on my talk page.[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 00:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
The following error is displayed when visting [[Newsletter:Administrators' newsletter]] |
|||
{{ping|Kapol1234}}{{ping|Pavlov2}},Because I think this kind of proposal is disruptive, so I want to close this proposal,And I Think Those Sock puppets Can Duck. --[[User:千村狐免|<span style='font-weight:bold;font-family:"Lucida Console";color:#990033;'>千<i>村</i>狐免</span>]][[User talk:千村狐免|<sup style='font-weight:bold;color:#000;'> msg</sup>]] 04:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{ping|Pavlov2}}{{ping|千村狐免}}I repeat again, this sockpuppet is not held my me.[[User:Kapol1234|Kapol1234]] ([[User talk:Kapol1234|talk]]) 10:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{ping|千村狐免}}Where can participate in the steward election to obtain Check user rights?[[User:Kapol1234|Kapol1234]] ([[User talk:Kapol1234|talk]]) 10:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
[ba26798e8f169f81e1f6821f] /wiki/Newsletter:Administrators%27_newsletter MWContentSerializationException: The Newsletter content is invalid. |
|||
{{ping|Kapol1234}} The CheckUser and Oversight permissions here can only be authorized by Stewards and the system administrator, so the proposal you want to be Checkuser is invalid.--[[User:千村狐免|<span style='font-weight:bold;font-family:"Lucida Console";color:#990033;'>千<i>村</i>狐免</span>]][[User talk:千村狐免|<sup style='font-weight:bold;color:#000;'> msg</sup>]] 09:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:Confirmed sockpuppets are blocked. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 15:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::Hello, {{ping|MacFan4000}} Pavlov3 and MCC214 are confirmed sockpuppets of Kapol1234? Thank you! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 17:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yes CheckUser has confirmed that they are sockpuppets. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 19:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::Thank you! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 05:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Backtrace: |
|||
== CheckUser request == |
|||
from /var/www/html/extensions/Newsletter/includes/Content/NewsletterContentHandler.php(72) |
|||
[[User:Piccadilly]] is |
|||
#0 /var/www/html/includes/Revision/RevisionStore.php(1227): MediaWiki\Extension\Newsletter\Content\NewsletterContentHandler->unserializeContent() |
|||
suspected sockpuppet of [[User:Bugambilia]]([https://publictestwiki.com/wiki/User:Agunomu] [[Special:Diff/19566]]), thanks! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 10:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
#1 /var/www/html/includes/Revision/RevisionStore.php(1510): MediaWiki\Revision\RevisionStore->loadSlotContent() |
|||
:CheckUser shows no connection to other accounts. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 01:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
#2 [internal function]: MediaWiki\Revision\RevisionStore->MediaWiki\Revision\{closure}() |
|||
::OK, thank you! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 18:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
#3 /var/www/html/includes/Revision/SlotRecord.php(324): call_user_func() |
|||
#4 /var/www/html/includes/Revision/RevisionRecord.php(183): MediaWiki\Revision\SlotRecord->getContent() |
|||
#5 /var/www/html/includes/Revision/RenderedRevision.php(229): MediaWiki\Revision\RevisionRecord->getContentOrThrow() |
|||
#6 /var/www/html/includes/Revision/RevisionRenderer.php(226): MediaWiki\Revision\RenderedRevision->getSlotParserOutput() |
|||
#7 /var/www/html/includes/Revision/RevisionRenderer.php(164): MediaWiki\Revision\RevisionRenderer->combineSlotOutput() |
|||
#8 [internal function]: MediaWiki\Revision\RevisionRenderer->MediaWiki\Revision\{closure}() |
|||
#9 /var/www/html/includes/Revision/RenderedRevision.php(199): call_user_func() |
|||
#10 /var/www/html/includes/poolcounter/PoolWorkArticleView.php(91): MediaWiki\Revision\RenderedRevision->getRevisionParserOutput() |
|||
#11 /var/www/html/includes/poolcounter/PoolWorkArticleView.php(73): MediaWiki\PoolCounter\PoolWorkArticleView->renderRevision() |
|||
#12 /var/www/html/includes/poolcounter/PoolCounterWork.php(171): MediaWiki\PoolCounter\PoolWorkArticleView->doWork() |
|||
#13 /var/www/html/includes/page/ParserOutputAccess.php(328): MediaWiki\PoolCounter\PoolCounterWork->execute() |
|||
#14 /var/www/html/includes/page/Article.php(760): MediaWiki\Page\ParserOutputAccess->getParserOutput() |
|||
#15 /var/www/html/includes/page/Article.php(563): Article->generateContentOutput() |
|||
#16 /var/www/html/includes/actions/ViewAction.php(78): Article->view() |
|||
#17 /var/www/html/includes/actions/ActionEntryPoint.php(733): ViewAction->show() |
|||
#18 /var/www/html/includes/actions/ActionEntryPoint.php(510): MediaWiki\Actions\ActionEntryPoint->performAction() |
|||
#19 /var/www/html/includes/actions/ActionEntryPoint.php(145): MediaWiki\Actions\ActionEntryPoint->performRequest() |
|||
#20 /var/www/html/includes/MediaWikiEntryPoint.php(199): MediaWiki\Actions\ActionEntryPoint->execute() |
|||
#21 /var/www/html/index.php(58): MediaWiki\MediaWikiEntryPoint->run() |
|||
#22 {main} |
|||
I believe since PB2008 has been renamed recently and he was a subscriber of the newsletter - his account needs to removed from the list ; kindly look at this similar [[phab:T102|error]] reported at phabricator [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 20:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Critical: Phabricator is down == |
|||
:pinging @[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] and @[[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] as they are Sys admins [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 20:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{ping|MacFan4000}} It appears as if Phabricator has stopped working. Trying to load it causes this error message to appear: <br/> [[file:Phabricator-Down-Example.jpeg|500px]] |
|||
::Fixed [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 22:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==Requesting permissions removal from TenWhile6== |
|||
[[User:PorkchopGMX (on the go)|PorkchopGMX (on the go)]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX (on the go)|talk]]) 15:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:Yes I’m aware. It’s not compatible with PHP 8.1. I reported the issue and will likely revert to PHP 8.0 at some point. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 19:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
::I am assuming [[WP:AGF|good faith]] in this case—that [[User:VancityRothaug]] made this request with the right intentions. However, it’s important to understand that we do not remove rights from users simply because we believe they might not use them in the near future. Rights are removed only if users meet the criteria outlined in the [[TW:IP|inactivity policy]]. Since reinstating rights to an account is considered a logged-in action, the user is considered active. I encourage VancityRothaug to carefully review [[User:TheAstorPastor/Admins|the list]] showing users’ most recent logged actions and to apply grace periods only after thoroughly checking the dates of those actions. [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
Dear community, I hope this request finds you all well. On the 9th December I have filed a inactivity grace period against @[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] for being inactive for a period of 2 months, and set their rights to expire in 2 weeks, when the inactivity would reach 3 months as per the inactivity policy. The user has proceeded to make their rights permanent 3 minutes after the grace period notification was left on their talk page. Upon checking their user contributions I have seen that the user has received a grace period warning on the 23rd September, to which they responded wishing to keep their roles however after checking the users contributions further I have noticed that they have not edited '''at all''' since their reply to their first grace period notice. From my point of view, I believe this user is not showing any intent to use his permissions in the near future therefore I am beginning this community vote to have the users permissions removed. [[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]]) 17:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:You may read the [[Test Wiki:inactivity policy]] again. ''no edits or logged actions within the last three months'' means that your actions on 9th december ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=56269] and [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=56271]) were a clear violation of the policy, because my last logged action was [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=56054 on 6th december]. I know you are pretty new here, sysop since two weeks, but please try to be more careful. |
|||
== Rename request == |
|||
:As an explanation why I am not really active here: I am an active member of the wikimedia community, currently serving as a global sysop and sysop in two wikis. Sometimes I need to test things and thats the exact moment when I need my permissions here, that's why I want to keep them and why I will clearly use these permissions in the future. [[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 17:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
===Discussion=== |
|||
Hi. Please change my username to Magogre. Thanks! [[User:Startus|Mazzaz]] ([[User talk:Startus|talk]]) 13:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*{{s}} as requester. [[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]]) 17:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*I will not "vote" here, because I am obviously involved. But imo this is not backed up by any policy, as explained above. I am an active member of the [[m:User:TenWhile6|Wikimedia Community]] and there is basically no reason to make this complicated. This is a test wiki and I could literally request the permissions again, if they get removed. This request is one of the funniest and most unnecessary things that happend to me this year. --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 17:17, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::{{Done}} [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 23:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::This is nonsensical and completely against the wiki’s goal and purpose. {{not done}} [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] --> |
|||
== Add <code>(interwiki)</code> user right to Bureaucrat == |
|||
</div> |
|||
{{discussion top|Withdrawn [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 14:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
Right now, bureaucrats do not have the <code>(interwiki)</code> user right (which allows you to edit [[Special:Interwiki]]) but they can grant (and remove) themselves and others an extra user right group (Interwiki admin) to get around this restriction. This is obviously inconvenient, so I suggest we '''bundle the <code>(interwiki)</code> user right into bureaucrat, and remove it from steward'''. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 01:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
=== Support === |
|||
*{{Support}} as proposer. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 01:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*{{Support}} It's a good idea! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 12:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} for now. However, some edits to special pages still need to be carefully checked.[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 18:26, 8 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*{{Support}} It would be great! [[User:C1K98V|<b style="color:#FF0000">''C1K98V''</b>]] <sup>([[User talk:C1K98V|💬]] [[Special:Contribs/C1K98V|✒️]] [[Special:ListFiles/C1K98V|📂]])</sup> 06:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== |
==Request for Rename== |
||
* {{Oppose}} –[[User:CrazyFisherman|CrazyFisherman]] ([[User talk:CrazyFisherman|talk]]) 20:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC) Granting rights is exactly the purpose of the bureaucrat flag; too many rights directly for bureaucrats aren't necessary |
|||
**That is true, however crats (indirectly) already have access to Interwiki through the interwiki admin user right. This proposal eliminates the need for crats to grant '''themselves''' a right to edit interwikis. [[User:PorkchopGMX (on the go)|PorkchopGMX (on the go)]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX (on the go)|talk]]) 20:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
* <s>'''Weak'''</s> {{Oppose}}, as it's not really suited to bureaucrats. I suppose this could be added to the <code>sysop</code> toolkit. On the other hand, we may desire users have some higher level of competency. Not really sure what the best approach is here. On the one hand, this would reduce multiple hats being collected. On the other, I'm not certain adding to <code>sysop</code> is the best idea. One other idea might be to have only Stewards grant interwiki administrator? [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*:I don't think interwiki needs to be restricted to stewards. Interwiki rights are much less important than import, delete, block, etc. rights. I proposed the right be moved into bureaucrat because that was technically the status quo and therefore it would be the least controversial move. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 18:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*::[[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]], it's not really related to the <code>bureaucrat</code> role, ''at all'', though. ''That'''s why I don't support it. For context, the reason why it's restricted to Stewards on Miraheze is because of the potential to have malicious sites bypass the Content Security Policy. So, it's not a completely innocuous right. In this respect, the <code>block</code> and <code>delete</code> user rights are much more innocuous than the <code>interwiki</code> user right; importing ''can'' have potential issues, so I'd probably say this would be on par with ''that'', or maybe slightly ''above'' even. Above it would be interface administrator. My preference would be to delete a lot of the unneeded user groups that are below the <code>sysop</code> group, and just have one <code>testgroup</code> and maybe <code>autopatrolled</code> and <code>confirmed</code>. The rest could probably be turfed. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 01:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, I would like to request that this account be renamed to Alachuckthebuck, my username on wikimedia projects. [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Alachuckthebuck&oldid=971206504| link to userpage]. [[User:0hD33r!|0hD33r!]] ([[User talk:0hD33r!|talk]]) 00:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
=== Neutral/Abstain === |
|||
:{{done}} by [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] (log id 56662) <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 15:01, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: i remain neutral for now| however crats can grant themselves interwiki flag so i don't think it's neccessary; what do you mean by "removing it from steward"?. [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 13:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{section resolved|1=<span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 11:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
::The <code>(interwiki)</code> user right is already included with steward, this proposal would add that right to bureaucrat and remove it from steward (as redundant). [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 18:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
=== General comments === |
|||
* Procedurally, this proposal, though [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]], is invalid as [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewards]] are the ''only'' community-elected, non-test administrators on Test Wiki. As such, the community has no capacity to restrict the <code>steward</code>, or even <code>sysadmin</code>, user group from having full access to the MediaWiki permissions toolkit. It's more than a bit bureaucratic (pardon the unintended pun) for a Steward to have to add a test user group (<code>bureaucrat</code>) to perform a non-test action related to the [[mw:Extension:Interwiki|Interwiki]] extension. Additionally, what if a user does ''not'' want <code>bureaucrat</code> permissions but ''does'' want to test the Interwiki extension? I have severe problems with requiring them to request a user group they do not want. I would, however, support amending the policy to require that interwiki administrators have the same level of trust as bureaucrats. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 21:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
**Good point. I'll withdraw the proposal because a community vote isn't the best way to solve this issue. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 14:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
==Delegated rights and the [[TW:IP|inactivity policy]]== |
|||
== Requesting for import of templates Sockpuppet and Sockpuppeter == |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
::{{done|Clause kept}} per unanimous community consensus ''against'' removing it. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 02:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
Currently, for rights that are very high trust and delegated from Stewards or the community (such as NSS and AFA), those rights can be re-requested at any time. I would propose removing that clause, but I would like to hear the ideas of others: What should happen if a person holding one of those rights loses them due to inactivity and then re-requests them? [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Recently some users were blocked due to their abusively using multiple accounts. To avoid these users being unblocked by other users who have sysop right wrongly, I'd like to import these two templates from Enwiki and come here to look for some advice |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Sockpuppet][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Sockpuppeteer]. |
|||
===Discussion=== |
|||
The test page was created on my own sandbox, [[user:pavlov2/sandbox]], but seemed they didn't work correctly. |
|||
I {{Support}} the removal of this clause from the inactivity policy. I believe that an inactivity removal should be treated as a normal removal and hence require another community vote to regain their position. [[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]]) 15:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 13:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{withdraw}} vote, switching to {{o}} per @LisaBia @Tester and Bhairava7. [[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]]) 02:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Question == |
|||
{{Oppose}}, if the user already got approval to get those rights in the first place (i.e. they are trusted to handle sensitive role(s)), why over-complicate things just because of inactivity? If someone has a concern, they can just share it when the user re-requests the rights. There may be some exceptions but I'd otherwise support keeping the clause in. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 15:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hello. [[User:Naleksuh]] is blocked indefinite because blocked in meta wikimedia. This block is incorrect? Thanks! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 05:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:This block is valid for recent actions on another (non-wikimedia) site. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 12:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::OK, thank you! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 19:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{o}} As @[[User:Tester|Tester]] said, it would be better to request permission again without a community vote. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== c: == |
|||
{{o}} per @LisafBia and @Tester. --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 01:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Could "c:" potentially be used as a valid interwiki to Wikimedia Commons? Requesting here for others' opinions. [[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]] ([[User talk:Hellk77|talk]]) 16:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:[[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]], {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/29533|Done]]}}. <code>c:</code> is potentially a bit vague, and ''could'' refer to [https://commons.miraheze.org/wiki/ Miraheze Commons], but on Miraheze, <code>c:</code> points to Wikimedia Commons, if not mistaken. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 04:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.''</div> |
|||
==Utility of [[Test Wiki:Bots/Requests for approval]]== |
|||
== [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]]' Request for Stewardship == |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
{{Discussion top|{{Done|Done, successful [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 16:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)}}}} |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
Hi everyone, |
|||
::There is no consensus to delete the utility page at this time. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 16:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
Howdy! I thought the bots request page should be discussed by the community, as it doesn’t seem very necessary in my option. We have an extremely low number of [[special:listusers/bot|bots]], in fact there are only three that are not system bots/system admin operated. The amount of bots that need crat rights is incredibly low. I propose that users looking to create a bot that needs crat permissions simply posts on a stewards talk page. To be honest, I don’t see this type of request happening in the near future. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 02:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:I {{support}} the removal of this page per X - it is currently very rare for a steward to receive a request to give a bot crat permissions and if this were ever to happen they could just leave their request on the talk page of a Steward. [[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]]) 07:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::{{withdraw}} to change to {{oppose}} per @[[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]]. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 20:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose}}. I don't see anything wrong with having a dedicated page—a bot being given Bureaucrat permissions is pretty notable in my opinion and so there should be a publicly-viewable and '''easy-to-access''' place. Even though the approval may not require community consensus, anyone can just go to the page to know more about the bot and any relevant discussions, rather than scouting recent changes or looking at stewards' talk pages. Additionally, the administrator newsletter doesn't appear to go into much depth on the tasks of the bot so I think this page should be kept. Thanks. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 04:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::I would completely agree with you, if this was something that happened often. However, I cannot find anywhere that it has occurred besides '''once''' in TestWikis entire history. One time. That is completely not worth having a request page about. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 15:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::While I appreciate the intention to limit extra pages which have no substantial use, I still think keeping a dedicated page would be better. Plus, it is scalable. Thanks! <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 04:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} Reasons are already given.[[User:DodoMan|DodoMan]] ([[User talk:DodoMan|talk]]) 12:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{o}} per [[User:Tester|Tester]] and it's reason is clear indicate why the page should not be delete.Happy Testing! --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 16:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Neither you or Tester has addressed the sole concern of the discussion, the fact that this request has only occurred once. Additionally, as the creator of the page, you have a [[WP:WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 17:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{Ping|X}} I have not problem to the deletion of bot approval page but I've created this page after private discussion with an Stewards, If stewards saying to me, I'll be going to delete this page because I have no problem.Happy testing! --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 17:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Though Test Wiki is hosted on Fosshost (formerly hosted on MacFan4000's cloud-based VPS) and not the Miraheze wiki farm, there's a fair bit of user crossover between Test Wiki and Miraheze users. Indeed, the two stewards and system administrators on Test Wiki are either current or former stewards and/or system administrators on Miraheze. Ostensibly due to real life priorities, not to mention his myriad online activities, Test Wiki has been served, essentially, by only one steward and system administrator in MacFan4000. At the same time, similar to there being a fair bit of crossover between Miraheze and Test Wiki users, there's a fair bit of crossover between Miraheze and Test Wiki LTAs. So, similar to Void, as a Miraheze [[mhmeta:Stewards|Steward]], I'm seeking election as a Test Wiki Steward, so I can assist with those processes. Obviouusly, my Miraheze commitments, which includes my separate involvement with the [https://wiki.mirahezebots.org/wiki/ MirahezeBots] project where MacFan4000 is also a senior developer and bot operator, preclude me from being hugely active on Test Wiki, but this is also ''by design'' as I prefer to let Test Wiki bureaucrats gain confidence and experience in actioning permissions requests and tending to obvious vandalism. And, as a very active user in the Test Wiki IRC channel, as well as Miraheze IRC channels, I'm usually just a quick {{tl|ping}} away. |
|||
:{{support}} removal, due to little utility. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 22:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::{{withdraw}} to change to {{oppose}}. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 19:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose}} having this page makes everything easier to find and organize. Personally, I see no reason to remove it. [[User:BZPN|BZPN]] ([[User talk:BZPN|talk]]) 00:23, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}}, as requester. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 00:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose}}, I see the usefulness of this page. I was also the steward who recommended this page so that there is a public place for this type of request. As rare as it is, I think it is a good idea to have such a page. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 19:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.''</div> |
|||
==DodoBot== |
|||
Hello, im re-active now.I have a little question, my bot now work, but just for fix typos for the moment, what features do you want for my bot.I prefer basic actions but if i have to code a script, i code it.Thanks.[[User:DodoMan|DodoMan]] ([[User talk:DodoMan|talk]]) 17:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==Confirming resignation as system administrator== |
|||
Hello. It's been quite a while since I've taken any technical action. I have become rusty in the meantime, so have resigned as a system administrator. I may return, but only after a community confirmation vote. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for your service! [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 01:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank for your service as System admin. Happy testing!--- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 03:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:Procedural note: User has returned to their system admin position. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 17:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==Piccadilly Appeal Terms== |
|||
{{Discussion top|Both proposals successful. Piccadilly may not be unblocked unless a year has passed and the community (in addition to Stewards) accept an appeal. I will add to this in my sole discretion: Piccadilly may not be unblocked unless concrete evidence of actual change has been submitted, either in the form of proof of attendance in a therapy program, or if there has been at least 1 year of good behavior in another community. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 22:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
The following is a community request for comment about Piccadilly’s appeal timeframe and form as the user has been blocked again. Please express your opinion on each proposal. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 00:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
===Extend appeal timeframe=== |
|||
Piccadilly is currently prohibited from appealing their ban for a period of 6 months, per Drummingman’s initial unblock conditions. I propose extending this time to one year as the user has made it clear to us over and over that they will not change. They keep coming back every 3-6 months with no behavioral difference. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 00:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}}: As proposer. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 00:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}}: --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 04:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 15:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 08:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
===Community appeal only=== |
|||
Additionally, I propose requiring that, for Piccadilly to be unblocked, there is a community appeal discussion. Piccadilly has abused the community enough to where they deserve a direct say in any appeal. The process would look like this: Piccadilly waits the selected timeframe. Piccadilly appeals to the steward email address. Stewards discuss appeal internally, and if approved, forward it to the community for a discussion on the community portal. I and others are frustrated with how this continues to be handled and the leniency to which we give LTAs. This proposal would give some say back to the community. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 00:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}}, as proposer. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 00:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}}: --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 04:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Support|Strong Support}} -Piccadilly always Violate Test Wiki policy and every time blocked by Stewards and Bureaucrats for violation of Test Wiki's policy and also for it's work. I'll be suggesting please avoid unblocked for Piccadilly because I have special concerns to them after unblocking they 'll be trying to violated again Test Wiki's policy and {{Ping|Drummingman}} is great guy and they think and decided to grant a chance again to Piccadilly for it's unblocking. Happy testing!--- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' |
|||
*{{support}} - I have reviewed their activity on Test Wiki in detail and I see no attempts to change behavior, leading me to the conclusion that this proposal would fit the community better. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 11:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} Unfortunately Piccadilly hasn't changed her behaviour. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 15:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 08:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*I weakly {{support}} with special recommendations to Stewards, as someone who has dealt with this user for some time. This issue resembles exactly what happened with Apex (previous name) on Miraheze, viewable at Miraheze: Global ban for ApexAgunomu in the RfC section. This RfC was after Apex was poorly managed at Steward level and given many many many chances only to squash them all. So it became necessary for the community to opine where it realistically shouldn't have to, in ideal circumstances stewards will have reasonable expectations and only unblock when evidence suggests the pattern will not repeat. If stewards are to humor/pass through an appeal, they should do so with one of two expectations (neither involving how much time has passed or how much Apex promises to do better). They should see a pattern at some other community of Apex contributing without outbursts or being blocked long term. Or there should be reasonable evidence that Apex has sought professional help and growth for these outbursts that have plagued her across several platforms. Nothing less in this circumstance would make sense. If an appeal is forwarded to the community without assurances of either, the community should take up the task of looking for this evidence. --'''[[User:Raidarr|raidarr]]''' '''('''[[User_talk:Raidarr|💬]]''')''' 18:19, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
==Restrict abusefilter-access-protected-vars and abusefilter-protected-vars-log to AFAs and stewards?== |
|||
Thanks, |
|||
{{discussion top|Doing, as there have been no objections within 4 days. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 17:24, 18 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
Because <code>abusefilter-access-protected-vars</code> have the potential for regular administrators (who might not be familiar with abuse filters) to mark a filter as permanently protected without the ability to reverse it, I suggest we should restrict it to only abuse filter administrators and stewards who have the trust of the community to work with filters that might cause huge disruption if configured incorrectly, the same way as <code>abusefilter-modify-restricted</code>. Similarly, the log for abuse filter regarding protected variables might also have to be restricted to those two groups, since they might deal with personal information. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 18:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
: {{support}} Trustworthy user and more active than the other stewards. [[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]] ([[User talk:Hellk77|talk]]) 21:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Discussion=== |
|||
: {{support}} Very trusted. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 05:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} as the proposer. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 18:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} Trusted user, and also Void is about to be removed for inactivity. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 14:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} due to this user right having the power to make sensitive and irreversible changes to abuse filters. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 19:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 08:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{Support|Strong support}} per Tenwhile --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 09:17, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{Discussion bottom}} |
{{Discussion bottom}} |
||
==DisambiguousMonths== |
|||
== Request for interface-admin == |
|||
Can a steward remove he all his rights because he unblocked self, and re-give to bureaucrats there rights.And re-block it.Sorry for my bad english but i repeat i'm french.[[User:DodoMan|DodoMan]] ([[User talk:DodoMan|talk]]) 08:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
I'd like to deploy the [[mhtest:MediaWiki:Gadget-userRightsManagerTW.js|RfP helper gadget]] that I wrote onto this wiki, which can do things like automatically adding users to [[MediaWiki:Gadget-markadmins.json]]. [[mhtest:Special:Diff/41224|I am the Arcversin from Miraheze/publictestwiki]]. — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 23:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: |
:{{done}} by DrummingMan. [[User:DodoMan|DodoMan]] ([[User talk:DodoMan|talk]]) 08:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
:all actions reversed. --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 08:45, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Because of this, we should restrict giving bureaucrat rights to only stewards. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 08:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::I don't think thats the right answer to this abuse. [[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 08:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::Perhaps not that, but we should maybe restrict removing bureaucrat rights to stewards, and remove the unblockself right from Bureaucrats? It would certainly prevent the abuse, but then Stewards would have to manage the inactivity policy with Bureaucrats. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 08:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I agree with those options. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 09:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::I agree with Justa's comment. --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 09:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::To be honest, we have never really had an issue with crat abuse before, I feel like making multiple rights changes is a little brash. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 11:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::::I disagree. It's not rash to implement preventative measures after a problem occurs. I'm not sure what the alternative is. Wait until the problem occurs more?[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 13:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Justa's idea (''restrict removing bureaucrat rights to stewards'') is something we can discuss. I'd suggest to create a new section and do a community vote on this. [[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 14:45, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::If stewards are up to taking on the role of managing bureaucrats' inactivity, I have no problem with supporting! |
|||
:::::I suppose removing unblockself could cause inconveniences, as that could prevent one from undoing a test block on oneself. Also, if someone else with rights goes rogue and blocks a bureaucrat, they would then have to wait for someone else to undo their block. Why not just remove privileges when blocking someone? <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 14:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{Ping|TenWhile6}} Hi there, What is the exact answer of this abuse.😅--- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 08:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
It is not necessarily a good idea to restrict bureaucrat assignment and removal because of two main factors. One is that it's plainly quite rare an instance, although Justa is correct that if there is an issue then it should be patched and we shouldn't hope that people won't do it again. That is burying one's head in the sand. The other factor is that restricting bureaucrat grant/removal without altering standards is that a future abuser can simply do it again and change their tactics. They can make a different stream of hard to reverse actions and not be easily handled by a fellow bureaucrat. A Steward's intervention will be required in one example, in the other it might but won't necessarily be required. Removing permissions is relatively simple to undo and this incident was dealt with quite expediently. The train of abuse goes deep in a rabbit hole: to pick apart another suggestion, not permitting unblockself means a rogue bureaucrat can simply block everyone else first and then that's another problem that's harder to resolve. On top of the inconvenience already suggested. |
|||
Instead, it seems to me a reasonable answer is to increase the surface of people who can deal with the problem. Perhaps there should be an autopatrolled type access for more senior testers/bureaucrats, whom's access cannot be removed by 'mere' bureaucrats. This lets more established bureaucrats or even trusted but not very active community members deal with rogues and make it harder to sneak in and gain destructive, harder to reverse access with the minimum standard of autoconfirmed that bureaucrats currently have. This would be their only access and it could be assigned at the trust of stewards so there are more people who could respond to an incident like this, but wouldn't complicate everyday operation by requiring a steward step in for every instance of bureaucrat addition and removal and going rogue. This answer might have problems but I think it's a more elegant place to start. |
|||
== Request to enable the [[mw:Extension:Purge|Purge]] extension == |
|||
My 2c, |
|||
--'''[[User:Raidarr|raidarr]]''' '''('''[[User_talk:Raidarr|💬]]''')''' 17:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==Restrict removing bureaucrat rights to Stewards== |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
||
::The proposal is Withdrawn by the requester. --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 16:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Though there is also a purgetab gadget as MacFan4000 notes, [[w:WP:CON|consensus]] is [[w:WP:SNOW|quite clear]], unanimous in fact, witb participating users ''all'' preferring the extension over the gadget. Once installed, we ''can'', and arguably [[rfc:2119|''should'']], uninstall the gadget. As a side note, I haven't been able to get the purgetab gadget to work, and suspect others have not as well. A Phabricator ticket will be opened [[phab:|here]], for [[Test Wiki:System administrators|sysadmins]] to implement and which links to this consensus discussion. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::'''Link to Phabricator ticket:''' #[[phab:T59|T59]] [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<s> Due to recent abuse, I propose restricting removing bureaucrat rights to Stewards, with Bureaucrats still able to resign through removing the right from themselves. This ensures that Bureaucrats cannot be removed by rogue Bureaucrats. If this proposal passes, please notify a Steward for any bureaucrat inactivity. </s>[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 15:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 15:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
This [[rfc:2119|''should'']] be non-controversial enough so as not to require a full discussion, though users are welcome to express comments if they wish (I suspect they will be supportive), but can we please install and enable the [[mw:Extension:Purge|Purge]] extension on Test Wiki? Thanks. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 05:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{withdraw}} per recent discussion on discord. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 16:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
: {{support}} Helpful extension; I don't see a reason why not to do so. [[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]] ([[User talk:Hellk77|talk]]) 02:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: |
:Raidarr has pointed out disadvantages with this proposal on Discord, mainly that Bureaucrats cannot remove rogue Bureaucrats if this goes into effect. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 15:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
: |
:Proposal withdrawn. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 16:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
:{{Comment}} The purgetab gadget is enabled by default. I believe it accomplishes the same goal. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 03:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::MacFan4000, I actually ''have'' that enabled, but it does not work. Moreover, I'd rather have it enabled for everyone by default, without having to enable a gadget and rely on either (a) cherry-picking in gadget updates from the external source or (b) using a remotely hosted gadget and being at the whims of the upstream gadget source (i.e., English Wikipedia), who typically do not care about non-Wikimedia wikis. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 06:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Support}} per comments above. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 06:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Support}} Sure, why not? (Also, is this still going?) --[[User:DarkMatterMan4500|DarkMatterMan4500]] ([[User talk:DarkMatterMan4500|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/DarkMatterMan4500|contribs]]) 16:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{support}} Required extension; It has to enabled. Thanks [[User:C1K98V|<b style="color:#FF0000">''C1K98V''</b>]] <sup>([[User talk:C1K98V|💬]] [[Special:Contribs/C1K98V|✒️]] [[Special:ListFiles/C1K98V|📂]])</sup> 03:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Support}} --[[User:Q8j|Q8j]] ([[User talk:Q8j|talk]]) 22:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.''</div> |
||
==Crat Abuse RFC== |
|||
== Interwiki with wikt: == |
|||
{{Discussion top|There is no clear consensus, therefore no action will be taken at this time. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 20:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
What should we do about the recent abuse of crat rights? '''Option 1''': Do nothing. |
|||
'''Option 2''': Add the ability to remove crat rights to non-steward suppressors. |
|||
'''Option 3''': Create a Trusted user group, as described [[User:Justarandomamerican/Trusted users|here]]. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 17:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} Doing nothing, {{oppose|Weak oppose}} option 2, {{oppose|Strong oppose}} Option 3. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 18:05, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, could <code><nowiki>wikt:</nowiki></code> be used as an active interwiki from here to Wiktionary? Requesting here for others' thoughts. [[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]] ([[User talk:Hellk77|talk]]) 17:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: |
::But what if the vandal goes at the peak of their rogue and no one takes action? Number 1 is a possible issue. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 18:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
:: @[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] Then why doesn't [https://testwiki.wiki/wiki/wikt:Main_Page this] work, but [https://testwiki.wiki/wiki/c:Main_Page this] does? They're both interwikis. [[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]] ([[User talk:Hellk77|talk]]) 21:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::: And why doesn't [https://testwiki.wiki/wiki/commons:Main_Page this] work either? [[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]] ([[User talk:Hellk77|talk]]) 21:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::: {{ping|Hellk77}} That's because they don't have the "forward" flag enabled (under [[Special:Interwiki]]). — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 21:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::: Is it OK if it is enabled, seeing as others are also enabled (like <code>c:</code>)? [[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]] ([[User talk:Hellk77|talk]]) 03:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: It's fine to enable it, especially if it's already enabled in another prefix. Generally the concern with enabling "forward" is whether the site is trusted enough to assume it's not going to be hosting phishing attacks. — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 13:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: Okay, thank you! It's enabled now. [[User:Hellk77|Hellk77]] ([[User talk:Hellk77|talk]]) 01:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Support|Strong}} option 2 --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 18:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== [[MediaWiki:Gadget-markadmins.js]] == |
|||
:{{Support|strongest}} Option 1, {{Oppose}} 2 and 3. Given that this is the first such incident, I don't think we need to do anything right now. If this starts happening more often in the future, then maybe. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 20:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Can someone (preferably an IA/S/SA) review [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/Gadget-markadmins.js|my version]] of the gadget and then merge it? I tweaked it so as to automate the ''get''ting process. That being said, if my version is approved, we will no longer have to edit [[MediaWiki:Gadget-markadmins.json|the JSON page]] manually. [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh]] ([[User talk:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|talk]]) 19:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support|strong}} per MacFan4000. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 22:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh]], though this exceeds my level of JS scripting expertise, this ''seems'' reasonable and, looking at your code, there does not seem to be any potential issues. As such, I've <br /> {{Done|[[Special:Diff/20691|done]]}} this request for you. However, I'd like [[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] to take a second look, though, making any tweaks/revisions, as required. Also, I know I've asked you to confirm your Miraheze account on Wikimedia, but can you also provide a Wikimedia confirmation edit for your Test Wiki account? Thanks. :) [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Hey @[[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]], can you make it clear which option you support? [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh}} {{ping|Dmehus}} Looking over the new script, it's fine, however there are a few small mistakes in terms of compatibility. MediaWiki only supports ECMAScript 5 (as opposed to 6) in most places (notably, this does not apply to scripts loaded directly from a URL), which means that you need to use the <code>var</code> keyword instead of <code>let</code>, which I've fixed. Also, making use of <code>mw.Api</code> requires that a dependency on <code>mediawiki.api</code> be added in [[MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition]], which has been done. Apart from that, the code works quite well. Do note that it would need an update should TestWiki grow to >500 sysops. — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 01:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::I am supporting exactly what MacFan4000 says. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 19:46, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{od|2}} Thanks to Arcversin for the fix, and for Dmehus: [[:metawikimedia:vi:Special:Permalink/66430817]]. [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh]] ([[User talk:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|talk]]) 16:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose}} for option one, but {{support|strong}} on options 2 and 3. It's better to be safe than sorry. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 15:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:1 ~ 3 ~ 2 : Doing nothing in this case is the best option as it was the first incident and I don't think that there would be more such incidents in future. [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 02:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Oppose}} option 1; {{support|strong}} Option 2. Self removal of crat should exist, and removal of others crat should only be done by stewards. {{Support}} for option 3, that can also work. ''Prevention is better than cure'', something should be done. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 10:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Oppose|Weak oppose}} option 1, {{Support}} option 2 or 3. It would be useful to have more users capable of taking action quickly if this kind of abuse happens again in the future. --'''[[User:Brewster239|<span style="color:#002F6C;">Brewster</span>]][[Special:Contribs/Brewster239|<span style="color:white;background:#002F6C;">239</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Brewster239#top|<span style="color:#002F6C;">''talk''</span>]]</sup>''' 17:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:Since Drummingman is going to close this anyways, {{oppose}} option 1, {{support|weak}} option 2, {{support}} option 3. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 17:22, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} option 1, {{oppose}} option 2, {{support|weak}} option 3. --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 23:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{Discussion bottom}} |
|||
==SecurePoll on Test Wiki== |
|||
==Inactivity policy== |
|||
{{Discussion top|Consensus seems to be for option #4 (install only for testing, will not be used for community discussions/votes. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 20:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
Hello, can you see [[User talk:Startus#Removal of bureaucrat.]]? Thanks! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 11:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
There has recently been a discussion on Phorge regarding the addition of the SecurePoll Extension to Test Wiki. @[[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] said that community consensus is required to add the extension so I would like to ask the community on how they would like to see the extension accommodated in 2 easy options to select: |
|||
:[[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]], thank you for your question. Your understanding of [[Test Wiki:Inactivity policy]] is the same as mine. Specifically, the one-hour rights readdition clause only applies to Stewards and System Administrators, ostensibly chiefly because those roles require a successful community vote at [[Test Wiki:Community portal]]. As to whether someone must wait the standard hold period before readding <code>bureaucrat</code>, I'd say your understanding is also likely correct, but it's also common sense. Provided someone didn't lose their <code>bureaucrat</code> bit for cause or otherwise resign under a cloud of scrutiny, that seems fine. Hope that helps. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
'''Option 1''' - SecurePoll is a Steward-only tool used for hosting community discussions. '''Option 2''' - SecurePoll is a tool usable by everyone, for both community discussions and for testing purposes. '''Option 3 ''' Dont add SecurePoll to Test Wiki. With kind regards, [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 14:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] Thank you for your reply. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 05:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::No problem, happy to have helped. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 01:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Option 1=== |
|||
== Rename request == |
|||
This would involve adding SecurePoll as a steward-only extension. |
|||
:<s>{{support}} as requester.</s> [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 14:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::{{withdraw}} [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 17:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose|Strong oppose}} The whole reason I requested this extention in [[phab:T117]] is because this is heavily restricted in Wikimedia wikis, and will be useful for the community as a whole to test. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 15:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose|Strong oppose}} This extension should not be used for non testing reasons, like community discussions. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 18:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose}} --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 00:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
===Option 2=== |
|||
Rename my name to Toshiba. [[User:Toshiba|Starus]] ([[User talk:Toshiba|talk]]) 06:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
This would involve adding SecurePoll for everyone. |
|||
:{{support|strongest}} as requester. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 14:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:<s>{{support|Strong}} See my above comment. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 15:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)</s> |
|||
::I am a little confused. On another proposal you said that you did not want this to be used for community discussions. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 18:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:X|X]] Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this option to grant the rights to create/edit polls to everyone for testing? <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 03:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::This one is for testing AND community discussion. Option four is just testing. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 17:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::If that's the case, I have striked my vote. Other comments by me should clarify my stance. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 17:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} would be helpful, assuming the PII issue with election admins gets fixed. [[User:Alachuckthebuck|Alachuckthebuck]] ([[User talk:Alachuckthebuck|talk]]) 17:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose|Strong oppose}} This extension should not be used for non testing reasons, like community discussions. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 18:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::The “for everyone” part implies that everyone would be granted access to this extension though. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 18:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::Your original statement was “ SecurePoll is a tool usable by everyone, for both community discussions and for testing purposes” As long as the extension is being used for non-testing purposes, I oppose. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 20:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::You’re most certainly right hence why I have switched my support to the 4th option which excludes all usage from non-testing purposes. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 21:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
===Option 3=== |
|||
:I gotta admit, I thought you were Startus for a second before I read your talk page. [[User:I am One|I am one]] ([[User talk:I am One|as you are three]]) 15:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
This involves voting against the addition of SecurePoll. |
|||
:<s>{{support}} as requester.</s> [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 14:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::{{withdraw}}. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 17:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}}, avoiding redundant votes in other headers to explain my piece here. I do not believe SecurePoll brings anything to TestWiki. It is meant for specific use which I challenge even being overly suitable for Miraheze let alone a far smaller project. There is effectively nothing to be tested, nothing that is practical in the everyday life of MediaWiki that TestWiki is available for. There is less in this respect to test than say, CentralAuth, which itself has a host of (admittedly somewhat different) reasons it would not be suitable. Other extensions or features would make sense to me before this one. So SecurePoll is neither suitable for testing ''or'' non testing purposes. --'''[[User:Raidarr|raidarr]]''' '''('''[[User_talk:Raidarr|💬]]''')''' 23:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::@[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] There is stuff to be tested right? SecurePoll has various poll types and voter suffrage requirements to name a couple. Could you explain how it'll harm by adding this extension? Thanks. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 03:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::My question with this extension is twofold; what is there worth to test, and what value is it to be tested. In the case of most other extensions there are utilities for everyday sysops where it makes sense to get the ins and outs of the behavior. SecurePoll is an obscure, involved extension best involved when keys are being handled by trusted third parties for poll integrity, and since this relates to PII and tech duty I don't see this being meaningfully tested in any graphical way. The result is a point and click extension with extremely low market use. Hence not much brought to the table for testing purposes to merit the care of addition and whatever quirks, known or unknown its inclusion may bring. |
|||
:::This is a single vote, perhaps two when considering Justa paired with five, so if this logic does not compell the mass it is fine, and I do not feel strongly enough to persist further as nothing is necessarily harmed by adding it. I simply wish for more than the slim explanation and 'meh why not' to merit addition. |
|||
:::As a completely off topic point I recommend withdrawn/modified votes be struck by the original voter when this is done, as the reply with 'withdraw' or reply that starts with a withdraw and makes a barely noticeable change to the vote strength can be mildly confusing. --'''[[User:Raidarr|raidarr]]''' '''('''[[User_talk:Raidarr|💬]]''')''' 09:40, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:I was planning to close this, but I am going to support this option now, per the articulate reasoning of Raidarr. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 00:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
===Option 4=== |
|||
::Pinging {{Ping|MacFan4000}} - [[User:Sav|Tray]] ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Contribs</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Message me</span>]]) 17:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
This would involve installing SecurePoll and using it only for testing, not community discussion. |
|||
:[[User:Toshiba|Toshiba]] {{Done}}, per your request and because your [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]] username is confusingly similar with [[User:Startus|Startus]]. Please ''do'' ensure this username is kept for the very, very long term. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 14:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} Community discussion is a '''discussion''' for a reason, SecurePoll is a '''vote'''. With the limited participants (''not in the order of hundreds'') in discussions/sensitive perm requests here setting up a SecurePoll is a waste of time. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 15:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support|strong}} per Bunnypranav. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 19:12, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::{{withdraw}}, switching to {{support|strongest}}. There’s no point in using SecurePoll for discussions. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 21:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Support|strongest}} [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 21:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support|strongest}} [[User:DodoMan|DodoMan]] ([[User talk:DodoMan|talk]]) 07:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} --[[User:TenWhile6|TenWhile6]] 00:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
===Discussion=== |
|||
== Administrator request == |
|||
{{ping|VancityRothaug}} How are you supporting both option 1, 2 and 3, which from my understanding are completely opposite viewpoints. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 15:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:These are only my opinions on this matter. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 17:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, I signed up for this wiki to test the MediaWiki features. Please confirm my request. |
|||
::now that you mention this my votes don’t make sense. I have now corrected my votes. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 17:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 01:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::have you seen [https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T301180|this phab task about PII]?[[User:Alachuckthebuck|Alachuckthebuck]] ([[User talk:Alachuckthebuck|talk]]) 18:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::Yes, I have - I’ll be leaving the rights assignments to the System Administrators. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 21:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] Could you also strike the votes using <nowiki><s> and </s></nowiki> for clear clarity. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 11:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{Done}} [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 13:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{Discussion bottom}} |
|||
==NSS Removal Discussion: Bhairava7== |
|||
== Please reset my password == |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
::The NSS permission was removed from Bhairava7 (by Drummingman) per the former user's own request. <small>(non-steward closure)</small> <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 15:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
Hello everyone. After a conversation with the steward team, I am opening a discussion about the removal of non-steward suppressor rights from {{noping|Bhairava7}} with the rationale that the user doesn't fully understand the purpose of suppression and what should be suppressed vs. public. Additionally, they have leaked their own information (not realizing that it is PII) and created more work for the rest of the suppression team. I would also note that warnings were issued privately to the user. I'll lay out a brief summary of some things that have happened, but it is difficult as the matter contains non-public log information. |
|||
First, Bhairava7 leaked their location information on an alt with [[special:diff/55733|this edit]], which is now hidden from public view. For additional context, the user seemingly randomly said and described the area and city/country in which they live. This is an extremely poor example for a NSS to set, and Drummingman had to suppress the edit. |
|||
I forgot my password, please help me [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 18:25, 25 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:You should add an email address in your preferences, then request a password reset [[Special:PasswordReset|here]]. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 21:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Second, he [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=59012 blocked his own IP address], which again leaked his personal information, including his location. (You can very easily geolocate IP addresses) When confronted about this, he seemed unaware of the consequences of such action. I had to suppress this one. |
|||
== Is this email address invalid? == |
|||
Thirdly, Bhairava has suppressed edits that don't require suppression, which is generally a simple mistake that we discuss as a team (I myself am guilty of this). However, combined with our other concerns of incompetence regarding suppression, this is concerning. |
|||
staff[at]testwiki.wiki seemed to be invalid? Could anyone have a test on it?[[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2|talk]]) 16:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:This should probably be requested on the [https://phabricator.testwiki.wiki Test Wiki Phabricator]], as it is in scope of the [[Test Wiki:System administrators|system administrator(s)]]. I'll try and file a request soon. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 01:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{ping|Dmehus}}I'm so sorry that I forget my password, I will use this account to communicate with you here.[[User:Pavlov2~alternative|Pavlov2~alternative]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2~alternative|talk]]) 16:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
In conclusion, I am requesting that the non-steward suppression rights of Bhairava7 are removed for the above reasons. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 19:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Sav|Trayfel]]'s Request for Stewardship == |
|||
===Vote explanation=== |
|||
{{Discussion top|No consensus. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 23:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{s}} - You support removing NSS permissions |
|||
Good morning everyone, hope all is well with you. |
|||
{{o}} - You oppose removing NSS permissions |
|||
I am here, requesting Stewardship rights on the Test Wiki. I believe I am a trusted user, although new; I have made several good-faith edits and contributions towards the site. I am semi-active on the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Trayfel English Wiki] and have made several contributions to combating vandalism there. I have a plethora of knowledge about Miraheze and the English Wikipedia as a whole. |
|||
===Discussion=== |
|||
I am mainly requesting Stewardship so I can be an aid to {{Ping|MacFan4000}} & {{Ping|Dmehus}} here, on the Test Wiki. |
|||
:{{support}}, as proposer. -[[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 19:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
As Steward, I would mainly be checking users for socking and renaming users where requested. |
|||
:{{support}} per X. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 21:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose|Strong oppose}}; I have never abused the non-steward suppressor, and I am the person who blocked [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=58747 DisambiguousMonths] first when they were trying to abuse their users permissions, and in order to block them, I added suppressor rights to your user accounts because they removed my admin and manager rights along with other members. I admit I made a mistake, which I shouldn't have done as a suppressor, because I didn't know about it, but it doesn't mean that my rights should be removed, but I tried to correct my mistake. I think X has some concerns regarding me. I was appointed as NSS after [https://testwiki.wiki/wiki/Test_Wiki:Request_for_permissions/Archive_14#Kiteretsu_2 full community consensus], and if I felt I wasn't worthy of this right, I would have left it myself, and humans make mistakes. I should be given one last chance... Also, it is up to the will of the stewards and test wiki community... but one more thing: please remove my other rights also and block me from here. Happy testing! --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 03:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Your actions in the situation with DisambiguousMonths didn’t reflect your use of the suppression tools. I have no doubt in your ability to perform regular actions, like blocking and rights changes. You were elected by community consensus, but based on your actions in the role, it is up to the community again to decide your suitability for the position. All of us make mistakes, but your show a lack of understanding of suppression, and an inability to recognize that lack of understanding. |
|||
::Also, your last sentence is confusing, you want someone to remove all your rights, except NSS, and block you? [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 03:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::What I mean to say is that I was not a suppressor on any other wiki before TestWiki. I meant that all my rights should be removed if I do not get a final opportunity to prove myself as a trustworthy member. One does not gain experience only by staying in his mother's womb, one gains experience by coming into this world.. I feel a little unhappy but I can prove that I've not use this right to prove anything wrong or to prove my own actions. And as far as the block is concerned, you have already raised a finger on my character and actions, so I will block myself of my own will forever.Happy testing!--- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 04:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::I am not asking or saying that you should leave or be blocked from the site. Nor did I ever question your character. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 11:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Oppose}}. I had said yesterday, in a private channel on Discord, that I think he should be given a last chance. And said that we should not go to the community portal, but apparently, that is not understood.That has now happened and I deeply regret that. So, I am against revoked his right in that way. He himself with his NSS right hindered that rights vandal until I could stop him. Let me say, that I also see that Bhairava makes mistakes, but I would like to help him learn. I therefore, ask the community to give him chance to learn. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 07:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::How many warnings/final warnings/last warnings are we going to give people? This is a fundamental issue with the leadership of this wiki, that spans back to the Piccidally issue. |
|||
::Additionally, I had the approval of another steward when making the request, which you were also aware of, but failed to mention. |
|||
::'''Suppression tools are not learning opportunities''', they are sensitive and deal with user data and information. I am in no way saying you can’t make mistakes, I’ve openly admitted in my initial statement that I have made some. But he doesn’t fundamentally understand the permission and that is something that should not have to be taught/learned. |
|||
::Additionally, threatening to leave the wiki if a single permission of yours is removed shows me [[wp:wp:Hat collecting|wp:Hat collecting]] is involved as well. I’ve seen them do it on other wikis too. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 11:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::So you think that I am collecting [[Wikipedia:Hat collecting|hats]], this is wrong. I am very troubled in my real life, so I can leave the wiki, but I did not say that I will leave the wiki. You may feel bad about what I said, but the truth is that you do not like my contribution and the fact that I have the rights to NSS. I know that the Supressor tool is a very sensitive tool. I know how to use it very well. I made a mistake unknowingly, for which I apologize.Happy testing!--- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 13:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:Unfortunately, I must {{support|weakly}} this request. There are threefold issues with Bhairava7's use of the suppression tools, as described above. I ''am'' inclined to give him another chance, but thinking on it, I believe the best thing for the wiki is to remove his suppression rights. This is not because of his moral character, merely because he is unsuitable for the right at this time. Thanks, [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 13:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Comment, I have just [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=59289 revoked] his NSS right at Bahavia's request. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 15:18, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::Dear, @[[User:X|X]] I think this discussion can be closed? [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 15:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::How about that I can close this discussion since I wasn't involved? <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 15:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::That, is fine by me. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 15:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.''</div> |
|||
==[[MediaWiki:Gadget-markadmins.js]]== |
|||
Thank you for reading my application. I welcome any criticism, whether it be good or bad. |
|||
Please update markadmins.js as shown [[User:Bosco/markadmins.js|here]], thanks. [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 07:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Cheers, [[User:Sav|Tray]] ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Contribs</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Message me</span>]]) 10:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}. --- ''<span style="background:#000000;border:1px solid #FF0080;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#F70D1A">Bhairava7</span>]] • [[User talk:Bhairava7|<span style="color:#FF6700">(@píng mє-tαlk mє)</span>]]</span>'' 08:09, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} I actually thought you were already a steward. [[User:I am One|I am one]] ([[User talk:I am One|as you are three]]) 17:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Support}} Is very helpful user. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 19:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Question''' Do you have a [[metawikimedia:|Wikimedia]] and/or [[mhlogin:|Miraheze]] account? If ''so'', have you already provided confirmation edits on those wikis of your <code>testwiki.wiki</code> account? If you ''have'', please link to the diffs using an [[Special:Interwiki|interwiki]] link. If ''not'', please provide that. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 02:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Hi, {{Ping|Dmehus}}. I have updated my userpage to include confirmation. Warmest regards, [[User:Sav|Tray]] ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Contribs</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Message me</span>]]) 03:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::[[User:Sav|Trayfel]], thank you. :) [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 17:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Oppose}} Thank you, Trayfel, for the [[Special:Diff/21000|properly formatted]] confirmation edit of your [[metawikimedia:Special:CentralAuth/Trayfel|Trayfel]] account on Wikimedia (though you [[rfc:2119|''should'']] still confirm your account on Miraheze as well (''especially'' if it's the same username as on here). Nonetheless, I thank Trayfel for putting their name forward for [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewardship]]; unfortunately and regrettably, I [[rfc:2119|'''must''']] oppose this (and not a weak oppose, per the articulated reason). For one thing, your account is ''barely'' [[Special:Redirect/logid/29359|two months old]]. ''Account age'', on its own, is not necessarily a prerequisite, but taken together with your [[metawikimedia:Special:CentralAuth/Trayfel|confirmed Wikimedia global account]] having ''only'' ~300 global edits in the past twelve months since it's been created, almost all of which are either (a) userspace sandbox edits and/or (b) counter-vandalism remediation on [[w:Special:Contributions/Trayfel|English Wikipedia]], I am unable to ascertain your overall technical ability. Additionally, and perhaps more crucially, you have '''zero (0)''' patrol log entries on Test Wiki, only '''three (3)''' [[Special:Log/Sav|user rights log entries]], one of which was [[Special:Redirect/logid/29954|an incorrect interpretation]] of the [[Test Wiki:Inactivity policy|inactivity policy]] and [[Special:Redirect/logid/29956|correctly overturned]] by [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]]. Granted, I ''will'' say that [[Test Wiki:Inactivity policy]] is, admittedly, a ''bit'' unclear, but nevertheless, the preceding in a manner the user thought they were ''certain'' they were correct when they were ''not'' is at least a bit problematic. Other than a few test blocks, there's really no other edits and log actions to assess the user's understanding of, and ability to ''apply'', our policies, so I am unable to get any real clear ''sense'' of that. Finally, the user identified wanting to assist MacFan4000 and I with user renames and checking for sockpuppetry. In terms of the former, there have been only '''[[Special:Log/renameuser|fifteen (15) renames]]''' in the preceding six (6) calendar years and, seeing as I have only had to add my <code>checkuser</code> hat in the more than one month since I've been a Steward and since I am also active daily here, in terms of daily review of the community portal, permission requests, and recent changes, I don't feel there's a sufficient rationale here ''either''. It'd ''potentially'' be, ''if'' I had a better sense of the user's technical and policy-based abilities. Finally, I noted that you've only very recently joined our IRC channel, which I'd also like to have seen you be more active as well. You no doubt seem helpful and constructive, but nevertheless and, as such, this is, as I say, regrettably, at least a bit [[w:WP:TOOSOON|too soon]]. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 17:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: Thank you, Dmehus. I appreciate your input.[[User:Sav|Tray]] ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Contribs</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Message me</span>]]) 19:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: Did you possibly mean [[W:WP:NOTQUITEYET|not quite yet]] and not [[w:WP:TOOSOON|too soon]]? WP:TOOSOON is about article notability, while WP:NOTQUITEYET is about denial for moderately experienced members. [[User:I am One|I am one]] ([[User talk:I am One|as you are three]]) 14:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{Discussion bottom}} |
|||
==Test page policy== |
|||
== Request a desysop for User:Pavlov2 and a permanent lock for that user == |
|||
{{Discussion top|This policy was proposed in February, and there has been no activity for over a month. The policy is unnecessary, as the proposer themselves noted {{tq|that [the] test pages rarely come up}}. This proposal may be reconsidered for a vote in the future if its necessity is justified, but for now, it fails. [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
I propose this to you all, the <s>[[</s>User:Renamed user 58678/Sandbox|test page policy<s>]]</s>. I know it's not a lot, but I believe that users should at least do it in an organized manner when it comes to testing. This policy is saying everything I should be telling you all here, but I'm giving it a chance to be read by you all to see if it is worthy of being a policy. [[User:Renamed user 58678|Faithful]] ([[User talk:Renamed user 58678|talk]]) 23:55, 2 February 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{oppose|Weak oppose}}, seems very unnecessary. We almost never have new test pages added, and if someone disagreed with one being added, they could simply just propose it be removed on the CP. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 23:56, 2 February 2025 (UTC) |
|||
**I see your point on the process of adding new test pages. This makes the process pointless from your POV because there could be someone who opposes it and has that page removed via the community portal. However, now I'm starting to believe that mainspace page creation should be restricted to a specific group level, so that users will not fill it with spam or vandalism, except on the abuse filter test. But primarily, because of the test pages. For now, since your point makes sense for the activity period of Test Wiki right now, which is that test pages rarely come up, I'll put it to the side. However, I do believe that users should properly do their test experiments on the right testing page. Hence, if you want to test deletion, go to [[Deletion test]]; if you want to test protection, go to [[Protection test]], and so forth. That should be a policy. [[User:Renamed user 58678|Faithful]] ([[User talk:Renamed user 58678|talk]]) 01:10, 3 February 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose}} per X. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 14:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
==Proposal: Abolish the non-steward suppressor right== |
|||
Hi, this is Pavlov2, unfortunately, I forgot the password of the previous account. Please desysop it and lock that user. Thanks a lot[[User:Pavlov2~alternative|Pavlov2~alternative]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2~alternative|talk]]) 16:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{Discussion top|There is unanimous and clear consensus to abolish the non-steward suppressor (NSS) role going forward. While the original proposal called for immediate removal, Drummingman's suggestion—to allow the current NSS, namely [[User:X|X]], to retain their rights—received clear support. As such, X will retain their rights until they either resign or are appointed as a steward. No new NSS appointments will be made. This proposal is therefore closed as successful, with Drummingman's amendment adopted. [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 15:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
This was already partly discussed in the Test Wiki Discord server, and I'm ultimately bringing it up here as a proposal for the community to comment on. |
|||
I don't think a total lock is possible but I can desysop the account and block it for you. [[User:Piccadilly|Seiyena]] ([[User talk:Piccadilly|talk]]) 16:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Simply, I'd like to propose abolishing [[Test Wiki:Suppressors|non-steward suppressors]] on this wiki. We currently have two such users, me being one of them, but ultimately at this time, there is really not much need. There are mainly two factors to this, which I will be listing here. |
|||
{{ping|Piccadilly}} Thanks a lot[[User:Pavlov2~alternative|Pavlov2~alternative]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2~alternative|talk]]) 17:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
#The amount of suppressions, and especially suppression requests, are already low to this date. Except for two suppressions this month (one performed by me and the other by a steward), the last 50 suppressions date back to July last year, most of which were either reverted, performed as tests or performed for old edits/log entries. |
|||
:{{Ping|Pavlov2~alternative}} You can request that your old account be renamed so that you can retrieve your old username. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 17:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
#The community is too small, and not large enough to justify having independent suppressors or checkusers. On a wiki as small as this one, it is likely best to center the suppression task to the stewards, both since they already are experienced with CU/OS and personal information, and considering that they have already been the ones mainly handling suppressions on this wiki either way. This would also be a benefit for the security aspects as well, even if compromises are indeed rare here. |
|||
:{{Ping|AlPaD}} thanks a lot, Could I request to change to my old name?[[User:Pavlov2~alternative|Pavlov2~alternative]] ([[User talk:Pavlov2~alternative|talk]]) 17:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Pinging {{Ping|MacFan4000}} & {{Ping|Dmehus}} to handle the rename request.[[User:Sav|Tray]] ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Contribs</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Message me</span>]]) 03:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::We wouldn't likely be able to do this on Miraheze, but potentially, assuming [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] has no objections, and [[User:Pavlov2~alternative|Pavlov2~alternative]] agrees to the [[Test Wiki:CheckUser|CheckUser]], we could potentially run a CheckUser, then merge and delete the former into the latter account, then rename the merged account to [[User:Pavlov2|Pavlov2]]? [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 05:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Potentially, the community could consider to instead elect new stewards with the inactivity of Dmehus and decreased activity of Justa and MacFan, but in the current state, there isn't really a need nor a community large enough to justify having NSS at this time, and I therefore propose to instead center this task to the stewards. [[User:EPIC|EPIC]] ([[User talk:EPIC|talk]]) 13:12, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== Removing the chat plugin == |
|||
*{{support}} - as proposer. [[User:EPIC|EPIC]] ([[User talk:EPIC|talk]]) 13:12, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Chat extension doesn't work, and I think it should be removed. |
|||
[[User: |
*:Just for the record I would also be fine with Drummingman's suggestion to let current NSS keep the rights. [[User:EPIC|EPIC]] ([[User talk:EPIC|talk]]) 05:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC) |
||
:{{support}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 13:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== Seiyena == |
|||
:{{support}} [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 08:00, 31 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} -[[User:C1K98V|<b style="color:#FF0000">''C1K98V''</b>]] <sup>([[User talk:C1K98V|💬]] [[Special:Contribs/C1K98V|✒️]] [[Special:ListFiles/C1K98V|📂]])</sup> 02:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} - However, my opinion is that the current two NSSs may retain their rights until they become stewards or resign, and that no new NSSs will be appointed. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 19:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} Per Drummingman [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 08:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:{{support}} Drummingman’s alteration to the proposal. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 10:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
==Nomination of [[User:EPIC]] for Stewardship== |
|||
{{Discussion top|'''There is a clear, unanimous consensus to promote EPIC to steward. On behalf of the steward-team, congratulations.''' [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
As with the NSS removal, this was already partly discussed in the Test Wiki Discord server and I would like to officially create this nomination here on the community portal. I am hereby nominating [[User:EPIC|EPIC]] for a stewardship here on Test Wiki. I believe that they have shown extreme dedication to all the hats they hold both on Test Wiki and other, notable wikis and that they would be a perfect fit to help oversee the administration of Test Wiki, alongside with the other 3 stewards. As many of you may know, EPIC is also a steward on Wikimedia which I find to be a great achievement, further improving his experience. Please let me know if you have any other questions in the discussion below. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 08:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:I stated it in the Discord server as well so I will partly repeat that here; I'm willing to serve if the community and current stewards are in favor of it, since I could bring some further useful experience and extra help especially now that Dmehus is not currently active and two of the other stewards have decreased activity. One of the stewards have expressed their endorsement beforehand, so I'm ultimately accepting. I shouldn't have a big issue with keeping up my activity either, though I'll otherwise resign if I end up not meeting my expected activity levels. |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
:Noting for transparency that I'm currently a steward for the Wikimedia projects as well as a sysop on the Swedish Wikipedia and Meta (and a CheckUser on the latter). [[User:EPIC|EPIC]] ([[User talk:EPIC|talk]]) 08:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::The outcome here is that, yes, [[User:Piccadilly|Seiyena]]'s behaviour was indeed inappropriate, and the racially insensitive and homophobic comments also inappropriate, [[User:Kazrok4545|Kazrok4545]]'s [[Special:Redirect/logid/30479|block]] was also inappropriate for a few reasons. Firstly, as it was quite clear at [[Test Wiki:Request for permissions]] that this was a [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Steward]]-managed user conduct case, the block was inappropriate. Secondly, administrators here are, fundamentally, non-test administrators. Blocking open proxies, deleting spam, or reverting vandalism is fine, but serious user conduct issues [[rfc:2119|'''must''']] be left to Stewards, unless they've explicitly delegated certain aspects (i.e., my saying that <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> could be revoked if the conditions were breached, for example). Finally, and philosophically, part of developing good [[Test Wiki:Administrators|administrator]] skills beyond technical capability is developing the diplomatic skills and engaging with users to think of other, creative and, crucially, long-term solutions that are at least somewhat amenable to all. I ''had'' meant to ask [[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] to import the abuse filter from [[mhtest:|Public Test Wiki]], but my other responsibilities precluded that until now, so I ''do'' take that responsibility for not having done that sooner. Nevertheless, this is the solution I believe is the best. If, after a month or so (from now), it's clear Seiyena needs another time away from Test Wiki, I will make that call. Nevertheless, [[User:Piccadilly|Seiyena]], to be clear, you ''can'' curse, though I encourage you ''not'' to. What you '''cannot''' do is make racist, racially insensitive, xenophobic, or homophobic comments. Thus, [[User:Kazrok4545|Kazrok4545]]'s rights revocation is {{Done|endorsed}} by this [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Steward]]. You may re-apply for administrator after a minimum of 5-7 days, if a bureaucrat is satisfied with your good edits and log actions. You may then re-apply for bureaucrat on or after May 1st, again under the same terms. I have added several minor user groups, with a particular emphasis on <code>researcher</code>, which [[rfc:2119|''should'']] allow you review your revision deleted [[Special:DeletedContributions/Piccadilly|contributions]] and log actions, to help you understand what you '''cannot''' do here and make good edits. Together with [[User:Chrs|Arcversin]]'s abuse filter, hopefully this should guide you to constructive editing here. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
===Support=== |
|||
This participant started fighting, insulting. Use words that violate human rights. |
|||
#{{Support}} as nominator. [[User:VancityRothaug|'''<span style="background:#000000;color:#ffffff;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">VancityRothaug</span>''']] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/VancityRothaug|contribs]]) 08:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Please evaluate my actions applied to this user. |
|||
#{{support|strong}} Irrespective of the NSS removal proposal, EPIC is a clearly suitable candidate, and will definitely help this wiki. Highly trustworthy. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:<[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]></span> 08:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
If the rules allow, then I ask you to check this user with the CheckUser tool. Thanks. |
|||
#{{s}} sure, good luck! [[User:BZPN|BZPN]] ([[User talk:BZPN|talk]]) 19:26, 31 March 2025 (UTC) |
|||
#{{s}} Good luck! [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 19:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
#{{s}} Keep up the good work. -[[User:C1K98V|<b style="color:#FF0000">''C1K98V''</b>]] <sup>([[User talk:C1K98V|💬]] [[Special:Contribs/C1K98V|✒️]] [[Special:ListFiles/C1K98V|📂]])</sup> 02:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
#{{s}} [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 08:51, 2 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
#{{support}} [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 09:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
#{{support|strong}} Very trusted user and Steward on 2 wikifarms [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 08:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
|||
P.S: Sorry for the translation. |
|||
[[User:Kazrok4545|Kazrok4545]] ([[User talk:Kazrok4545|talk]]) 13:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:They've asked for the following statement to be copied from [[User talk:Piccadilly|their talk page]]: <pre>I realize that my edits were very wrong and inexcusable, and I am very sorry for putting such bad things here. I realize that at least a temporary block is warranted in this case, but if at all possible, could my current block be set to expire automatically, after which I can have one last chance to test admin and bureaucrat powers here?</pre> — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 14:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Oppose=== |
|||
:{{ping|Chrs|label1=Arcversin}} Thanks for the transfer! — Regards, [[User:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''Kazrok4545'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''<small>Talk</small>'''''</span>]] 14:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
::Hello! I suggest blocking some domain namespaces [[mhtest:Special:BlockList/ApexAgunomu|like Public TestWiki]], because she has some good edits and actions. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 17:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' </div> |
|||
:Hi, I just have one question. If a bureaucrat or admin sees someone making both good edits but also bad ones what do we do if they don't stop after we warn them? Should we try to alert a Steward as soon as possible and just clean up after them until a Steward can handle the situation? I think that maybe giving a short-term block (like one day) might be reasonable while waiting for a steward, just to stop active disruption until the situation can be handled properly. Just wanted to know in case a situation like this comes up again. |
|||
== Filter #52 == |
|||
{{ping|Dmehus}} Could you or another Steward please add <code>& page_id == 702</code> to [[Special:AbuseFilter/52|abuse filter 52]], as the second to last line? This would help prevent false positives (which result in no-warning indef blocks) by excluding [[Test Wiki:Request for permissions]] from said filter. Also, is there any way for non-Stewards to get edit access to those filters? — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 01:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]], sure. My other plan here is to create a non-test [[Test Wiki:Abuse filter helpers|abuse filter helpers]] user group, to be granted by [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewards]], that would allow technically capable abuse filter editors to be granted this permission and be able to edit restricted abuse filters. Users ''may'' request the permission from a Steward, but [[rfc:2119|should]] provide some evidence of technical capability in this area. It would be subject to the [[Test Wiki:Inactivity|inactivity policy]], and could be revoked if an abuse filter helper either (a) repeatedly made unconstructive changes to restricted abuse filters or (b) otherwise demonstrated to Stewards they either (i) not [[w:WP:CIR|technically competent]] or (ii) not trusted. Anyone have any objections to this? [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 04:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|Dmehus}} Not sure how, but I mistyped what should be added, it should be <code>!=</code> not <code>==</code>. As to your latter point, I would support that idea , but I would suggest it be named something other than "helpers", since Wikimedia uses that to refer to read-only access to private filters. — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 11:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||