User talk:Test94944: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: 26 October by TheAstorPastor
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Reply
Reply
Line 3:
::[[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CFA (bot)]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1318885678]. [[User:Test94944|Test94944]] ([[User talk:Test94944|talk]]) 15:56, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
:::Looking.. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 16:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
:::Thank you. I now have no objection to lifting the block and restoring the rights, although I would prefer that a steward handle it. As a general suggestion, you may use the comment section at [[TW:RFP]] or post at [[TW:CP]] to let others know in advance if you intend to create a large number of pages for testing. Doing so helps others recognize that your activity is legitimate and not disruptive. [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 16:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:02, 26 October 2025

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Test94944 (block logactive blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am creating pages to test a bot script for the English Wikipedia. I will nuke them when I am done. Test94944 (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

Script error: No such module "Template link general".

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

Script error: No such module "Template link general".

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

Script error: No such module "Template link general".
I see. Just to clarify, could you elaborate the purpose of this "bot script" and can you link and verify your enwiki account here? The AP (talk) 15:51, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CFA (bot). [1]. Test94944 (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Looking.. Drummingman (talk) 16:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I now have no objection to lifting the block and restoring the rights, although I would prefer that a steward handle it. As a general suggestion, you may use the comment section at TW:RFP or post at TW:CP to let others know in advance if you intend to create a large number of pages for testing. Doing so helps others recognize that your activity is legitimate and not disruptive. The AP (talk) 16:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply