User talk:Paflidy

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: Thursday at 08:15 by Paflidy in topic Bot
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hi, Paflidy.

Welcome to Test Wiki!

How do I start?
  • First, Go to the request rights page.
  • Click the request rights button and fill the automatically generated template out.
  • Please add a little information at User:Paflidy, your user page, so we can know about yourself.

-- Welcomer (talk) 12:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah Paflidy (talk) 08:43, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Permission

Paflidy, Hi there, You're eligible for sysop privileges, if you curious to testing with sysop permission, then please request for Administrator rights on TW:RfP. Happy testing! --- Bhairava7(@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Roger that, I will request sysop later 👍 Paflidy (talk) 13:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi there, you're now eligible for bureaucrat's right If you feel to need with testing crat's privileges, then please request at TW:RfP and ping me for faster response on permission page. :) Happy testing! --- Bhairava7(@píng mє-tαlk mє) 05:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

1

0 Paflidy (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

:|

1 Paflidy (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

a

a Paflidy (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

q Paflidy (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

A

A Paflidy (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Blocking spambots when they are already blocked by the abuse filter

As the section title says, if the abuse filter blocks obvious spambots, please do not reblock them as they are already blocked. Codename Noreste (talk) 15:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welp, ok then Paflidy (talk) 23:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Posting questionable links

As the title says, please do not post questionable links. Justarandomamerican (talk) 10:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

ah okay 😁👍 never meant it to be genuine spam anyways Paflidy (talk) 10:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
That's why I didn't block you, I assumed it wasn't genuine spam! Unsure why I deleted it for that reason.. Justarandomamerican (talk) 10:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Subject

Test😳 Paflidy (talk) 23:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

example

@Example You need to see this fact 👉🤯👈 Paflidy (talk) 03:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

c8cufbdu

test @Example Paflidy (talk) 05:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Blocking suspected spammers

Hello! I believe someone informed you of this earlier, but I’d like to bring it up again. Please don’t block suspected spam accounts without any edits. There is always a chance that it is simply a good-faith user. We have an extremely strong abuse filter to automatically block users that attempt to spam, so manual blocks on a hunch are unnecessary. X (talk + contribs) 11:31, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Oh ok sry, next time I will stop blocking accounts anymore 🙏 though I was suspicious of the account being a spam bot since it filled the realName= field with a (first name) (last name) format. Paflidy (talk) 11:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
No worries, we just want to prevent good faith users getting accidentally blocked! X (talk + contribs) 12:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Are you listening to X? Or am I seeing the complete opposite behavior? Faithful (talk) 22:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I just decide to block them earlier before they launch their spam because they are pests Paflidy (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Honestly, though, it is more rational to leave the blocking job up to the abuse filter; it is more capable of doing that job than we'll ever be. Plus, seeing a generic first and last name on a user's talk page doesn't automatically make them a spammer. I have learned that by reading X's message above. And you know, it can always be a good-faith user, so don't make assumptions so quickly nor act on them. Faithful (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

test II

@Bhairava7 Paflidy (talk) 11:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

A beer for you!

A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! A beer for you! Paltflidy (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

unblock template test

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Paflidy (block logactive blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

unblocktemplatetest

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

Script error: No such module "Template link general".

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

Script error: No such module "Template link general".

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

Script error: No such module "Template link general".

Paflidy (talk) 09:34, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

e

why there is a lack of activity lately dawg? Paflidy (talk) 08:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

yes

yes Paflidy (talk) 04:41, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

no

no Paflidy (talk) 04:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

yesno

Paflidy (talk) 04:49, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Alternative Accounts

Hey there! I’ve recently noticed an account called Paflidychat was created here on Test Wiki. Are you able to confirm if this account is yours? As per the Test Wiki:Bureaucrat policy you are only allowed to have bureaucrat rights on one account at a time. Additionally that account doesn’t even meet the requirements for this right and as a result the bureaucrat right has been removed. VancityRothaug (talk + contribs) 13:12, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I can make a confirmation edit there if you want Paflidy (talk) 22:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Bot

Dear Paflidy, I would like to ask you not to place bot right directly on your own account without the permission of a steward. A bot may not be placed directly on a normal account, unless it is for a short period of time for testing. If you continue without permission, I will be forced to revoke your bureaucrat rights. Greetings, Drummingman (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I'll honor your request. Paflidy (talk) 08:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply