User talk:Piccadilly: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 124: Line 124:
::::::::I'll request a ban on the community portal, thank you. [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 01:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::I'll request a ban on the community portal, thank you. [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 01:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::[[Test_Wiki:Community_portal#Request_for_Block_Against_Piccadilly|Done]] [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 01:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::[[Test_Wiki:Community_portal#Request_for_Block_Against_Piccadilly|Done]] [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 01:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::[[User:Sav|Sav]], I think you misunderstood. Being ''allowed'' to appeal a currently indefinite block '''does not''' mean the appeal will be ''successful''. They appealed their block over a month ago (or so), and it's ''not'' been removed, fundamentally, because, as Stewards, we agree they're '''not ready'''. When we ''do'' feel they're ready, I'd be happy, and am sure Justarandomamerican and Drummingman would be happy to ''consult'' with the community on what restrictions are needed, the duration of such restrictions, and a timeline for a gradual removal, as well as penalties for contravention. Allowing appeals is an important part of '''due process'''; to ''not'' allow an appeal, we'd be no better than, say, a totalitarian state like North Korea or even Russia, for that matter. At the end of the day, it's about balancing both '''due process''' as well as getting community feedback to ensure the user can be reintegrated. As to the racist slurs and racially insensitive comments, I am well of those. [[User:Piccadilly|Piccadilly]] goes by [[User:Skiyomi|Skiyomi]] on English Wikipedia. I've told them before it's '''not''' acceptable behaviour, will be revision deleted, and is grounds for immediate rights revocation and/or blocking or partial blocking as necessary. I know they don't ''mean'' them, and the user has said in our <code>#testadminwiki</code> IRC channel that they struggle with autism. I take them at face value and am happy to extend [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]] and grace, to a point. We're at the point right now where they need to remain blocked for an extended period of time, to demonstrate to Stewards, and, by extension, the community, they have the ''capacity'' to learn. :) [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 02:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu