Examine individual changes
This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change.
Variables generated for this change
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
Name of the user account (user_name) | 'X' |
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups) | [
0 => 'bureaucrat',
1 => 'interwiki-admin',
2 => 'sysop',
3 => '*',
4 => 'user',
5 => 'autoconfirmed'
] |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile) | false |
Page ID (page_id) | 7350 |
Page namespace (page_namespace) | 3 |
Page title (without namespace) (page_title) | 'X' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle) | 'User talk:X' |
Action (action) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary) | '' |
Old content model (old_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
New content model (new_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext) | '== F-TW (discussion cannot take place on For-Test Wiki) ==
Myht seems to have been unreliable lately. I'm not too sure what's going on, nor if Matt is aware, but myht.org has gone down with 500s for 2 days in a row. Perhaps if we have another system administrator who can reasonably spend on it, it may be worth considering switching hosting method and domain for FTW. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
:I agree. Site outages have became quite frequent. I have emailed Matttest about these issues and volunteered to become a system administrator, but have not heard back yet. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 01:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
== About protection ==
It is not right to take away the user's right to object with an amendment. Please be careful to [[w:WP:ASSUME|assume good faith]]. --[[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:What do you mean? The user abused their talk page while blocked (added the word foo), so I protected it from editing so they won't abuse it. Whats the problem? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 13:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:: This was still not an inappropriate change. As I said, assume good faith. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:::I did assume good faith. Twice. I told the user to be careful when I granted administrator rights the second time, and they still abused them. They then abused their talk page, (adding the word Foo over it, [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), so I temp protected it for 2 weeks to stop abuse and allow for appeals in two weeks. This is an appropriate action, and is justified. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::: Thanks for your good care and quick blocking of this user I can really appreciate that;-) I agree with LisafBia that the user should have the possibility to appeal. In case of abuse, access can be blocked, but protection is not necessary. :-) [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here], that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext) | '== F-TW (discussion cannot take place on For-Test Wiki) ==
Myht seems to have been unreliable lately. I'm not too sure what's going on, nor if Matt is aware, but myht.org has gone down with 500s for 2 days in a row. Perhaps if we have another system administrator who can reasonably spend on it, it may be worth considering switching hosting method and domain for FTW. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
:I agree. Site outages have became quite frequent. I have emailed Matttest about these issues and volunteered to become a system administrator, but have not heard back yet. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 01:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
== About protection ==
It is not right to take away the user's right to object with an amendment. Please be careful to [[w:WP:ASSUME|assume good faith]]. --[[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:What do you mean? The user abused their talk page while blocked (added the word foo), so I protected it from editing so they won't abuse it. Whats the problem? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 13:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:: This was still not an inappropriate change. As I said, assume good faith. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:::I did assume good faith. Twice. I told the user to be careful when I granted administrator rights the second time, and they still abused them. They then abused their talk page, (adding the word Foo over it, [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), so I temp protected it for 2 weeks to stop abuse and allow for appeals in two weeks. This is an appropriate action, and is justified. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::: Thanks for your good care and quick blocking of this user I can really appreciate that;-) I agree with LisafBia that the user should have the possibility to appeal. In case of abuse, access can be blocked, but protection is not necessary. :-) [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff) | '@@ -11,3 +11,3 @@
:::I did assume good faith. Twice. I told the user to be careful when I granted administrator rights the second time, and they still abused them. They then abused their talk page, (adding the word Foo over it, [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), so I temp protected it for 2 weeks to stop abuse and allow for appeals in two weeks. This is an appropriate action, and is justified. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::: Thanks for your good care and quick blocking of this user I can really appreciate that;-) I agree with LisafBia that the user should have the possibility to appeal. In case of abuse, access can be blocked, but protection is not necessary. :-) [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
-::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here], that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
+::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
' |
Lines added in edit (added_lines) | [
0 => '::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)'
] |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp) | '1684938513' |