1,142
edits
User talk:X: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
→About protection
Drummingman (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::: I know it. Thanks again for your concern. Should the user continue to disrupt instead of consulting about the block, then any admin and crat may revoke access by blocking it. Kind regards, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ::::: I know it. Thanks again for your concern. Should the user continue to disrupt instead of consulting about the block, then any admin and crat may revoke access by blocking it. Kind regards, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Why would we give this user special treatment? Convention is to revoke TPA or protect talk page upon disruptive behavior, which has occurred here. I genuinely don't understand why we wouldn't protect it for a few weeks to let the user think about their actions and to prevent abuse. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
