1,142
edits
User talk:X: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
→About protection
Drummingman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:: This was still not an inappropriate change. As I said, assume good faith. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | :: This was still not an inappropriate change. As I said, assume good faith. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: Thanks for your good care and quick blocking of this user I can really appreciate that;-) I agree with LisafBia that the user should have the possibility to appeal. In case of abuse, access can be blocked, but protection is not necessary. :-) [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ::: Thanks for your good care and quick blocking of this user I can really appreciate that;-) I agree with LisafBia that the user should have the possibility to appeal. In case of abuse, access can be blocked, but protection is not necessary. :-) [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::There '''was''' abuse, that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
