3,255
edits
Test Wiki:Community portal/Archive 8: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{partially done" to "{{partly done") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
==Extension request== | ==Extension request== | ||
Please install [[mw:Extension:ReplaceText|ReplaceText]]. [[User: | Please install [[mw:Extension:ReplaceText|ReplaceText]]. [[User:Saint|Username]] ([[User talk:Saint|talk]]) 01:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Drummingman for stewardship== | ==Drummingman for stewardship== | ||
| Line 218: | Line 218: | ||
2. What information do you think you should hide when you use supressor powers? [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 17:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC) | 2. What information do you think you should hide when you use supressor powers? [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 17:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:'''R:''' I will only use it in situations such as, removing personal information, copyright infringement, serious personal attacks or other grossly offensive material, as also indicated [[ | :'''R:''' I will only use it in situations such as, removing personal information, copyright infringement, serious personal attacks or other grossly offensive material, as also indicated [[Test Wiki:Suppressors|here]]. Furthermore, I will use my common sense and handle it carefully. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 18:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
3. Do you hold any non-test rights on any other wikis? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC) | 3. Do you hold any non-test rights on any other wikis? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| Line 789: | Line 789: | ||
:{{done}} as this is pretty uncontroversial and doesn’t warrant further discussion. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 16:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC) | :{{done}} as this is pretty uncontroversial and doesn’t warrant further discussion. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 16:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Proposal: Non steward CheckUser & Oversight/Suppressors== | |||
{{Discussion top|Clear community opposition and proposer blocked. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 12:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)}} | |||
Hello, I am proposing non-steward check user and oversight/suppressors, whilst there isn't an active need for extra check users or suppressors as of now, in my opinion, if there are enough people able to perform the role, then they should be in the role as it's always better to have more people when you don't need them but to have none when you need them. Because the two roles are quite high trust, I am proposing the following requirements for each role. | |||
Checkuser: | |||
#Basic understanding of IP addresses and ranges and CIDR syntax. | |||
#Pass a vote on the community portal with either 80% support, or 70-80% at a steward's discretion. | |||
#Have a good understanding of account security. | |||
#Performing unnecessary or abusive checks will result in having your access revoked. | |||
Suppressor: | |||
#Basic understanding of suppression criteria. | |||
#Pass a vote on the community portal with either 80% support, or 70-80% at a steward's discretion. | |||
#Have a good understanding of account security. | |||
I believe that this is also a way for users to gain additional trust. | |||
Being that the implementation of this could result in a lack of transparency with the community, I think that 2 additional groups should be added. These groups may not be added immediately, | |||
<code>non-steward-suppressor</code>Non-steward suppressor | |||
With the following rights: | |||
<code>unblockable</code> | |||
Add groups to own account: Suppressor | |||
Remove groups from own account: Suppressor | |||
<code>non-steward-checkuser</code> Non-steward CheckUser | |||
With the following rights: | |||
<code>unblockable</code> | |||
<code>checkuser-log</code> | |||
Add groups to own account: Check user | |||
Remove groups from own account: Check user | |||
Thank you, [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 13:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
*<s>{{support}}: This is a reasonable proposal, and allows trusted community members to assist Stewards in maintaining the wiki if they don't want or need the full steward toolset. Although, if someone is trusted enough for either of these, they should have at least part of the privileges of a Steward, such as the ability to [[Test Wiki: Bureaucrats|indefinitely block in difficult cases, being exempt from the recommendations for bureaucrats]]. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)</s> | |||
*{{oppose}}: Why do both sets of rights need the <code>unblockable</code> right? [[User:Dusti|Dusti]] ([[User talk:Dusti|talk]]) 14:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
*{{oppose}} as written, why should non-steward functionaries have the unblockable user right? If an emergency happens, a Bureaucrat should be able to block them from editing. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 13:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
*{{oppose}}. Why do they need unblockable? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 11:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
{{Discussion bottom}} | |||