1,150
edits
Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
→RFC: Allow non-steward suppressors to perform "steward actions": new section
(→EPIC) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
:::You know what? I agree, maybe we should keep it enabled. – [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 23:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | :::You know what? I agree, maybe we should keep it enabled. – [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 23:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::Yeah, they were a pretty big issue "back in the day". Would hate to have them come back because they know our protection has been disabled. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 23:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | ::::Yeah, they were a pretty big issue "back in the day". Would hate to have them come back because they know our protection has been disabled. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 23:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
== RFC: Allow non-steward suppressors to perform "steward actions" == | |||
Hi all, | |||
Looking back in my original proposal to create the non-steward suppressor group, I found that I forgot to add the ability to perform steward actions to the list. I think this is quite needed as suppression blocks are a large part of the job, in addition to evidence for blocks being hidden behind a suppression. For transparency, see [[User talk:Justarandomamerican#Suppression log]] for part of the reason why this is being proposed. Thank you. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 00:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
'''Discussion:''' [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 00:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
