1,150
edits
Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
→Non-steward oversighters/checkusers - alternate proposal: new section
m (Reverted edits by Justarandomamerican (talk) to last revision by Sav) Tag: Rollback |
(→Non-steward oversighters/checkusers - alternate proposal: new section) |
||
| Line 257: | Line 257: | ||
Warm regards, [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 03:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC). | Warm regards, [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 03:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC). | ||
== Non-steward oversighters/checkusers - alternate proposal == | |||
I propose allowing non-stewards to access checkuser/oversight tools, similar to the above proposal, but without the unblockable right. Being that the implementation of this could result in a lack of transparency with the community, I think that 2 additional groups should be added. | |||
non-steward-suppressor: | |||
Add groups to own account: Suppressor | |||
Remove groups from own account: Suppressor | |||
non-steward-checkuser: | |||
With the following rights: | |||
checkuser-log | |||
Add groups to own account: Check user | |||
Remove groups from own account: Check user | |||
These users can be appointed by either: | |||
1) Community consensus, closed by a steward | |||
2) Steward consensus, at least 2 stewards support giving the right | |||
A user may not hold both suppressor and checkuser rights, unless they apply for steward. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 17:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
