User talk:Piccadilly: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
→Block Appeal: Reply |
→Block Appeal: Reply |
||
| Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
:Dear, @[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]], @[[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] and @[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] what do you think? Before I will make a decision, I would like to hear your opinion too, of course, the opinion of non-stewards will also be considered. |
:Dear, @[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]], @[[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] and @[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] what do you think? Before I will make a decision, I would like to hear your opinion too, of course, the opinion of non-stewards will also be considered. |
||
:Greetings, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 16:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
:Greetings, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 16:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
::<small>(Non-[[Test Wiki:Stewards|steward]] comment)</small> Piccadilly has disrupted this wiki for a considerable amount of time, and has been given countless chances to improve and change her ways. |
::<small>(Non-[[Test Wiki:Stewards|steward]] comment)</small> Piccadilly has disrupted this wiki for a considerable amount of time, and has been given countless chances to improve and change her ways. |
||
::As it has been a few months since abuse has occurred, I am willing to support an unblock, but '''only''' on a one-strike basis. She would be given a single chance to show she has changed her ways. Any action, large or small, that reflects her past behavior would lead to an immediate, indefinite site-wide ban. |
::As it has been a few months since abuse has occurred, I am willing to support an unblock, but '''only''' on a one-strike basis. She would be given a single chance to show she has changed her ways. Any action, large or small, that reflects her past behavior would lead to an immediate, indefinite site-wide ban. |
||
::Any other conditions that allow more leniency will not be effective and I would strongly oppose it. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 17:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
::Any other conditions that allow more leniency will not be effective and I would strongly oppose it. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 17:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
::I think the proposed conditions are reasonable. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 22:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Thank you for your reply, and I do understand the concerns raised in your questions. To be honest, I think that the best way to ensure my success here is to enable the guidance abuse filter, and maybe also partially block me from the Talk namespace. And if I am unblocked, some conditions that could be considered are the following: |
Thank you for your reply, and I do understand the concerns raised in your questions. To be honest, I think that the best way to ensure my success here is to enable the guidance abuse filter, and maybe also partially block me from the Talk namespace. And if I am unblocked, some conditions that could be considered are the following: |
||
