User talk:Justarandomamerican: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
→Example account hide: Reply |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
::::::::Let's figure out the difference between our definitions. Me personally, it is vandalism where regular administrative tools would be insufficient to protect the community, such as repetitive slurs, attack names, etc. What is yours? [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 02:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
::::::::Let's figure out the difference between our definitions. Me personally, it is vandalism where regular administrative tools would be insufficient to protect the community, such as repetitive slurs, attack names, etc. What is yours? [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 02:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::::::I'd say anything that is extremely offensive to certain groups of people, including slurs, threats of harm, and other personal attacks that serve no administrative value to help prevent future attacks. This is why I only suppressed those with the one racial slur and not others like "Hi r____d". [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 11:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
:::::::::I'd say anything that is extremely offensive to certain groups of people, including slurs, threats of harm, and other personal attacks that serve no administrative value to help prevent future attacks. This is why I only suppressed those with the one racial slur and not others like "Hi r____d". [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 11:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::::::::To me, the priority needs to be balancing transparency against protection of the community. Completely suppressing a single racial slur (especially without a target) doesn't really protect any administrator.. My opinion is that serious vandalism should be suppressed only when it is necessary to protect the community. Thanks for the reply, [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
::::::::::To me, the priority needs to be balancing transparency against protection of the community. Completely suppressing a single racial slur (especially without a target) doesn't really protect any administrator.. My opinion is that serious vandalism should be suppressed only when it is necessary to protect the community. Thanks for the reply, and to be clear, certain things like sexually explicit/obscene material should be suppressed despite not having a clear target, due to their nature.[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::::::And yes: I jumped the gun whilst asking for community resolution. I'll take this and every dispute a bit slower next time. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 03:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
::::::::And yes: I jumped the gun whilst asking for community resolution. I'll take this and every dispute a bit slower next time. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 03:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::::<del>Honestly, we need new, community-defined suppression criteria to get rid of the constant confusion. I have proposed this on the community portal. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)</del> |
::::::<del>Honestly, we need new, community-defined suppression criteria to get rid of the constant confusion. I have proposed this on the community portal. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)</del> |
||