Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
→Proposal for a rights-bot: Reply |
|||
| Line 252: | Line 252: | ||
:::It might, and that was the original option, and I think that would be fine too. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC) |
:::It might, and that was the original option, and I think that would be fine too. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC) |
||
:::Activity bot sounds good to me, ngl [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 10:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC) |
:::Activity bot sounds good to me, ngl [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 10:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC) |
||
::I kind of like "[[User:Justarandomamerican (BOT)|Justarandomamerican]]," personally. I don't ''love'' shared bot accounts. We may well have multiple stewards running a 'rights bot' account, and the permission could easily be set by a steward on the applicable account. Unless there's a web-based reporting and administration tool that allows stewards to 'run' the bot via that interface, a log entry in the reporting tool is generated when successfully or unsuccessfully run, etc., then I think we could go with a generic name like "RightsBot". [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 18:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==Resignation== |
==Resignation== |
||
