User talk:Kazrok4545: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
m Text replacement - "UT:Kazrok4545" to "User talk:Kazrok4545" |
(username or IP removed) Fix Lint errors: Stripped tags |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Hi Kazrok4545, |
Hi Kazrok4545, |
||
While I ''can'' appreciate your good-faith wanting to help [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewards]] here in regards to user conduct, and [[User:Piccadilly|Seiyena]] ''does'' need guidance, the prior practice of blocking indefinitely and repeatedly blocking the [[w:WP:SOCK|sockpuppets]] was ''not'' working, and the user ''is'' making progress, demonstrating [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]], and incremental ''capacity to learn''. In addition, as it was quite clear at [[Test Wiki:Request for permissions]], Seiyena was being managed by Stewards, and I would've supported you revoking their bureaucrat bit, the blocks were steps too far. Likewise, if you'd offered to assist [[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] with setting up an abuse filter I was about to ask him to set up here, that would also have been fine. As such, though I normally prefer to ''warn'' first before temporarily revoking rights, in this case, I felt a slightly firmer hand was needed here, and have {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/30514|revoked]]}} your <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> and [[Test Wiki:Administrators|sysop]]</code> bits for '''two (2) weeks''' from today, after which any <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> ''may'' re-add it. |
While I ''can'' appreciate your good-faith wanting to help [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewards]] here in regards to user conduct, and [[User:Piccadilly|Seiyena]] ''does'' need guidance, the prior practice of blocking indefinitely and repeatedly blocking the [[w:WP:SOCK|sockpuppets]] was ''not'' working, and the user ''is'' making progress, demonstrating [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]], and incremental ''capacity to learn''. In addition, as it was quite clear at [[Test Wiki:Request for permissions]], Seiyena was being managed by Stewards, and I would've supported you revoking their bureaucrat bit, the blocks were steps too far. Likewise, if you'd offered to assist [[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] with setting up an abuse filter I was about to ask him to set up here, that would also have been fine. As such, though I normally prefer to ''warn'' first before temporarily revoking rights, in this case, I felt a slightly firmer hand was needed here, and have {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/30514|revoked]]}} your <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> and <code>[[Test Wiki:Administrators|sysop]]</code> bits for '''two (2) weeks''' from today, after which any <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> ''may'' re-add it. |
||
Thank you again for your other constructive contributions here. :) |
Thank you again for your other constructive contributions here. :) |