410
edits
User talk:Matttest: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Block appeal: + No problem
(→Block appeal: + No problem) Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
# When you use the rollback tool, it is a must that the edit is either vandalism or spam. However, rollback is used to my questions and comments on the community portal, which doesn’t fall into the categories above. Can you explain why you use such a tool? Blocks are not meant to get rid of a user’s constructive opinions, and so an undo should also not be made to my edits. | # When you use the rollback tool, it is a must that the edit is either vandalism or spam. However, rollback is used to my questions and comments on the community portal, which doesn’t fall into the categories above. Can you explain why you use such a tool? Blocks are not meant to get rid of a user’s constructive opinions, and so an undo should also not be made to my edits. | ||
As such, I believe this block is inappropriate and should be removed at once. Cc {{ping|MacFan4000}} for steward intervention on this block. -[[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 03:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | As such, I believe this block is inappropriate and should be removed at once. Cc {{ping|MacFan4000}} for steward intervention on this block. -[[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 03:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
*{{Comment}} Since it seems you already send notification to MacFan4000, They'll decide what to do with your block. There's nothing for me to say. I'll leave it to them.--[[User:Q8j|Q8j]] ([[User talk:Q8j|talk]]) 04:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
*{{Comment}} I believe this block was indeed unjustified. {{Ping|Q8j}}, this was inappropriate and inconsiderate. From what I can see, this user has not vandalised nor edited under bad faith. Their only edit was done to the Community Portal, in which, they were directing a question to a request for Stewardship. I will be removing your block, {{ping|Matttest}}. Apologies for this unjust action. [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 07:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
*:Thanks for removing the block. -[[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 08:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::No problem. I apologise for it happening in the first place. [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 09:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::'''[[Test Wiki:Stewards|Steward]] comment:''' Technical evidence is absolutely clear here: '''Matttest''' is the operator of several impersonation only and vandalism only accounts. I'm conferring with [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] on the outcome, but my recommendation is for an indefinite CheckUser block here. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::::For greater clarity, the [[Test Wiki:CheckUser|CheckUser]]-confirmed sockpuppets were as follows: [[User:MаcFan4000|MаcFan4000]], [[User:Dmеhus|Dmеhus]], and [[User:Vagvgabgag|Vagvgabgag]]. I'm working with [[User:MacFan4000|the ''real'' MacFan4000]] to enable transwiki imports on '''Test Wiki''', so we can import the sockpuppet and sockpuppeteer templates from Meta Wiki on Wikimedia. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::::Thanks for the mention, {{user|Dmehus}}. --[[User:DarkMatterMan4500|DarkMatterMan4500]] ([[User talk:DarkMatterMan4500|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/DarkMatterMan4500|contribs]]) 22:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::::::[[User:DarkMatterMan4500|DarkMatterMan4500]], no problem. :) [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC) | |||