Editing User talk:Kazrok4545
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Hi Kazrok4545, | Hi Kazrok4545, | ||
While I ''can'' appreciate your good-faith wanting to help [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewards]] here in regards to user conduct, and [[User: | While I ''can'' appreciate your good-faith wanting to help [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Stewards]] here in regards to user conduct, and [[User:Seiyena|Seiyena]] ''does'' need guidance, the prior practice of blocking indefinitely and repeatedly blocking the [[w:WP:SOCK|sockpuppets]] was ''not'' working, and the user ''is'' making progress, demonstrating [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]], and incremental ''capacity to learn''. In addition, as it was quite clear at [[Test Wiki:Request permissions]], Seiyena was being managed by Stewards, and I would've supported you revoking their bureaucrat bit, the blocks were steps too far. Likewise, if you'd offered to assist [[User:Arcversin|Arcversin]] with setting up an abuse filter I was about to ask him to set up here, that would also have been fine. As such, though I normally prefer to ''warn'' first before temporarily revoking rights, in this case, I felt a slightly firmer hand was needed here, and have {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/30514|revoked]]}} your <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> and [[Test Wiki:Administrators|sysop]]</code> bits for '''two (2) weeks''' from today, after which any <code>[[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> ''may'' re-add it. | ||
Thank you again for your other constructive contributions here. :) | Thank you again for your other constructive contributions here. :) | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<br />[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | <br />[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
:Dear friend {{ping|Dmehus}} | :Dear friend {{ping|Dmehus}} | ||
::Okay, I got it. I will try not to apply sanctions against other users anymore. I blocked this user for numerous violations. He was warned more than once. It seemed to me that in the case of unconstructive behavior of a user, a warning should be issued (issued by other users), and then sanctions should be applied if the user does not understand what they want to convey to him. This decision was made based on experience in Wikimedia projects. — Regards, [[ | ::Okay, I got it. I will try not to apply sanctions against other users anymore. I blocked this user for numerous violations. He was warned more than once. It seemed to me that in the case of unconstructive behavior of a user, a warning should be issued (issued by other users), and then sanctions should be applied if the user does not understand what they want to convey to him. This decision was made based on experience in Wikimedia projects. — Regards, [[U:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''Kazrok4545'''''</span>]] [[UT:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''<small>Talk</small>'''''</span>]] 03:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
:[[User:Kazrok4545|Kazrok4545]], As a counter-balance to the above, I ''do'', and ''have'', {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/30516|endorsed]]}} your [[Special:Redirect/logid/30488|revocation]] of the user's [[User:Platinum Rose|alternate account]] having [[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] permissions. In my view, as a best practice, I ''do'' think that no user's alternate account [[rfc:2119|should]] have ''any'' permission '''above''' that of [[Test Wiki:Administrators|sysop]] and would strongly encourage any other bureaucrats that have provided their alternate accounts with such permissions to surrender those bits accordingly. What do you think? [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | :[[User:Kazrok4545|Kazrok4545]], As a counter-balance to the above, I ''do'', and ''have'', {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/30516|endorsed]]}} your [[Special:Redirect/logid/30488|revocation]] of the user's [[User:Platinum Rose|alternate account]] having [[Test Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] permissions. In my view, as a best practice, I ''do'' think that no user's alternate account [[rfc:2119|should]] have ''any'' permission '''above''' that of [[Test Wiki:Administrators|sysop]] and would strongly encourage any other bureaucrats that have provided their alternate accounts with such permissions to surrender those bits accordingly. What do you think? [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
:[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]], I agree with the statement above. Indeed, that additional accounts should not have flags above admin. Sorry for the translation.— Regards, [[ | :[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]], I agree with the statement above. Indeed, that additional accounts should not have flags above admin. Sorry for the translation.— Regards, [[U:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''Kazrok4545'''''</span>]] [[UT:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''<small>Talk</small>'''''</span>]] 03:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | ||