User talk:X: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 16: Line 16:
:If a user is blocked, their talk page is for '''appeals''' only, and there is no need to wait for more disruption to revoke TPA or protect the talk page. This action was reasonable and preventative, not punitive. I agree with X. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:If a user is blocked, their talk page is for '''appeals''' only, and there is no need to wait for more disruption to revoke TPA or protect the talk page. This action was reasonable and preventative, not punitive. I agree with X. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::I believe the actions were also good and certainly not punitive, and revoking access at that time was also helpful and good. We are now almost a day away, let's see if the user continues to abuse? If yes? Then you can revoke access. I would like to give the user a chance to explain and appeal this blocking. I really understand your concerns, With collegial regards [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 15:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::I believe the actions were also good and certainly not punitive, and revoking access at that time was also helpful and good. We are now almost a day away, let's see if the user continues to abuse? If yes? Then you can revoke access. I would like to give the user a chance to explain and appeal this blocking. I really understand your concerns, With collegial regards [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 15:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:::Okay, let's see. Thank you, [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 15:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)