User talk:X: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
→About protection: +note
(→About protection: +note) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::::: I know it. Thanks again for your concern. Should the user continue to disrupt instead of consulting about the block, then any admin and crat may revoke access by blocking it. Kind regards, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ::::: I know it. Thanks again for your concern. Should the user continue to disrupt instead of consulting about the block, then any admin and crat may revoke access by blocking it. Kind regards, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Why would we give this user special treatment? Convention is to revoke TPA or protect talk page upon disruptive behavior, which has occurred here. I genuinely don't understand why we wouldn't protect it for a few weeks to let the user think about their actions and to prevent abuse. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | :::::: Why would we give this user special treatment? Convention is to revoke TPA or protect talk page upon disruptive behavior, which has occurred here. I genuinely don't understand why we wouldn't protect it for a few weeks to let the user think about their actions and to prevent abuse. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:If a user is blocked, their talk page is for '''appeals''' only, and there is no need to wait for more disruption to revoke TPA or protect the talk page. This action was reasonable and preventative, not punitive. I agree with X. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
