User talk:Proof: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
:::::Yes, I agree blocked user can request for unblock from their original talk page. But I thought the comment above is just attack under the guise of "unblock request".[[User:Q8j|Q8j]] ([[User talk:Q8j|talk]]) 20:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
:::::Yes, I agree blocked user can request for unblock from their original talk page. But I thought the comment above is just attack under the guise of "unblock request".[[User:Q8j|Q8j]] ([[User talk:Q8j|talk]]) 20:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
:This does not appear to be a valid unblock request. Indeed as worded it suggests the exact opposite, that an [[:CommunityWiki:BanningUsers|indefinate]] [[:meatball:CommunityExile|Community Exile]] is the best path forward for all parties as nothing in the request nor your history thus far clearly evinces a desire to either conduct any testing yourself nor to facilitating testing for others, and you obviously have no intention of ever becoming a [[:meatball:CommunityMember|Community Member]]. Indeed for [[:CommunityWiki:OnlineCommunity|Online Communities]] in general and [[:meatball:WhatIsaWiki|wikis]] in particular, people whose personal agendas and actions appear to be unrelated to the communities [[:meatball:WikiMission|purpose]] are always at risk of having their privilege to contribute removed.<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>Please understand that, as long as you continue to create [[:meatball:SockPuppet|sockpuppets]] for the sole purpose of hurling accusations of misbehavior/launching personal attacks/casting aspersions upon other users, that all of your edits will be reverted, all of the pages you create will be deleted, all of your accounts will be blocked, and it will take a local sysop all of 60 seconds to accomplish this (admittedly boring) task, while you waste much more of your own time to make the mess in the first place.<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>No respectable wiki will block people because a random person on the internet attacks them with claims that they are racist, homophobic, or have some other personality defects. Blocks will only be issued if contributors demonstrate that behavior on the wiki, and none of our currently active contributors have such problems, or if there is strong evidence of extensive off-wiki harassment or similar undesirable behavior directed towards other users that threatens the integrity of the project, and no something that anyone can photoshop about anyone else does not count.<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>If you do in fact poses solid evidence of a local contributor harassing others off-wiki, you may submit it in private via [mailto:staff@testwiki.wiki staff@testwiki.wiki].<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>Also as a word to the wise, while there is no local policy saying that the user talk pages of blocked users ''must'' only be used for requesting unblocks. Access to them may be revoked if disruptive editing occurs just as it would for any other pages, and yes repeated improperly evidenced accusations leveled by name against other contributors are disruptive. If talk page access is revoked any future appeal would also need to occur via e-mail.<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>And just so things are clear, none of this has nothing to do with [[:CommunityWiki:DontHateThePlayer|you personally]], it's just a standard [[:meatball:WikiPatternLanguage|WikiPattern]], and [[:meatball:RightToLeave|you are free to leave at anytime]]. Regards, [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]]) 01:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
:This does not appear to be a valid unblock request. Indeed as worded it suggests the exact opposite, that an [[:CommunityWiki:BanningUsers|indefinate]] [[:meatball:CommunityExile|Community Exile]] is the best path forward for all parties as nothing in the request nor your history thus far clearly evinces a desire to either conduct any testing yourself nor to facilitating testing for others, and you obviously have no intention of ever becoming a [[:meatball:CommunityMember|Community Member]]. Indeed for [[:CommunityWiki:OnlineCommunity|Online Communities]] in general and [[:meatball:WhatIsaWiki|wikis]] in particular, people whose personal agendas and actions appear to be unrelated to the communities [[:meatball:WikiMission|purpose]] are always at risk of having their privilege to contribute removed.<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>Please understand that, as long as you continue to create [[:meatball:SockPuppet|sockpuppets]] for the sole purpose of hurling accusations of misbehavior/launching personal attacks/casting aspersions upon other users, that all of your edits will be reverted, all of the pages you create will be deleted, all of your accounts will be blocked, and it will take a local sysop all of 60 seconds to accomplish this (admittedly boring) task, while you waste much more of your own time to make the mess in the first place.<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>No respectable wiki will block people because a random person on the internet attacks them with claims that they are racist, homophobic, or have some other personality defects. Blocks will only be issued if contributors demonstrate that behavior on the wiki, and none of our currently active contributors have such problems, or if there is strong evidence of extensive off-wiki harassment or similar undesirable behavior directed towards other users that threatens the integrity of the project, and no something that anyone can photoshop about anyone else does not count.<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>If you do in fact poses solid evidence of a local contributor harassing others off-wiki, you may submit it in private via [mailto:staff@testwiki.wiki staff@testwiki.wiki].<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>Also as a word to the wise, while there is no local policy saying that the user talk pages of blocked users ''must'' only be used for requesting unblocks. Access to them may be revoked if disruptive editing occurs just as it would for any other pages, and yes repeated improperly evidenced accusations leveled by name against other contributors are disruptive. If talk page access is revoked any future appeal would also need to occur via e-mail.<div style="margin-top:.5em"></div>And just so things are clear, none of this has nothing to do with [[:CommunityWiki:DontHateThePlayer|you personally]], it's just a standard [[:meatball:WikiPatternLanguage|WikiPattern]], and [[:meatball:RightToLeave|you are free to leave at anytime]]. Regards, [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]]) 01:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
: {{ping|Fast}} I can confirm that Cocopuff2018 has made comments in #wikipedia-en that were seen by others as homophobic and was banned by a channel operator due to it. However, if [[User:Proof]] wants to raise a concern about [[User:Cocopuff2018]], they can do so without sockpuppetry as that will certainly not be taken seriously. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 07:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
110

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.