User talk:CrazyFisherman/Archive: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 6 May 2021 by CrazyFisherman in topic "blocked for spam" notices
mNo edit summary |
(archived) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<big> | <big> | ||
'''This user is inactive''' | '''This user is mainly inactive''' | ||
</big> | </big> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== [[user:URIScott07924464|URIScott07924464]] == | == [[user:URIScott07924464|URIScott07924464]] == | ||
Why did you block that user and state to review the abuse log for evidence? When I checked abuse log there is no logs matching your claim. They have no contributions to the test wiki at all. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Ronja</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Ronjapatch|u]] • [[User talk:Ronjapatch|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ronjapatch|c]])''</small> 19:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC) | Why did you block that user and state to review the abuse log for evidence? When I checked abuse log there is no logs matching your claim. They have no contributions to the test wiki at all. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Ronja</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Ronjapatch|u]] • [[User talk:Ronjapatch|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ronjapatch|c]])''</small> 19:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
== "blocked for spam" notices == | |||
Hi, please don't put "blocked for spam" notices on spambot user pages. It's unnecessary and creates a lot of extra pages. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 19:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
:Okay, I am not going to place them anymore. --[[User:CrazyFisherman|CrazyFisherman]] ([[User talk:CrazyFisherman|talk]]) 10:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:43, 15 May 2021
This user is mainly inactive
Archive of User talk:CrazyFisherman
Pleaso do not edit this page!
blocked-spam and protect blocked users` user page
How about mark this kind of edits as bot-edit? Zhuofan WuCien años de soledad 13:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- I am going to do it in the future. Thanks! --Morneo06 (talk) 17:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Why did you block that user and state to review the abuse log for evidence? When I checked abuse log there is no logs matching your claim. They have no contributions to the test wiki at all. ~ Ronja (u • t • c) 19:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
"blocked for spam" notices
Hi, please don't put "blocked for spam" notices on spambot user pages. It's unnecessary and creates a lot of extra pages. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 19:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I am not going to place them anymore. --CrazyFisherman (talk) 10:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)