User talk:Cocopuff2018: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 7 January 2021 by Fast in topic Advice
(→Advice: new section) |
(fix) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<! | <!-- Proposing auto-archive specifications for Cocopuff2018. Remove this line if accepted. | ||
{{Autoarchive/config | {{Autoarchive/config | ||
|archive = User talk:Cocopuff2018/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Cocopuff2018/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|archiveheader = | |archiveheader = | ||
{{Archive}} | {{Archive}} | ||
--> | |||
== Advice == | == Advice == | ||
While the motivation for your edits on [[User talk:Proof]] is understandable, the [[:meatball:SignalToNoiseRatio|]] of that conversation has long dropped below the level where continued engagement is likely to produce a constructive dialogue. As this matter involves private evidence it would be best for all parties involved if further discussion were restricted to e-mail or other private off-wiki channels. Best, | While the motivation for your edits on [[User talk:Proof]] is understandable, the [[:meatball:SignalToNoiseRatio|SignalToNoiseRatio]] of that conversation has long dropped below the level where continued engagement is likely to produce a constructive dialogue. As this matter involves private evidence it would be best for all parties involved if further discussion were restricted to e-mail or other private off-wiki channels. Best, [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]]) 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:58, 7 January 2021
Advice
While the motivation for your edits on User talk:Proof is understandable, the SignalToNoiseRatio of that conversation has long dropped below the level where continued engagement is likely to produce a constructive dialogue. As this matter involves private evidence it would be best for all parties involved if further discussion were restricted to e-mail or other private off-wiki channels. Best, Fast - ZoomZoom (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)