Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
m
Reverted edits by Justarandomamerican (talk) to last revision by Zippybonzo
m (→Survey) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
m (Reverted edits by Justarandomamerican (talk) to last revision by Zippybonzo) Tags: Rollback Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 386: | Line 386: | ||
::::::::::No, I also said an active steward as well, they are enough, the decision that was not great IMO was on FTW when you and X decided to take away IP privacy from abusive users, I’m not going to use it against you as I heavily doubt that you came up with the idea of it, but, there are a few conditions under which I’d support stewardship. | ::::::::::No, I also said an active steward as well, they are enough, the decision that was not great IMO was on FTW when you and X decided to take away IP privacy from abusive users, I’m not going to use it against you as I heavily doubt that you came up with the idea of it, but, there are a few conditions under which I’d support stewardship. | ||
::::::::::If any of the following conditions are met. | ::::::::::If any of the following conditions are met. | ||
::::::::::#The wiki grows to the point where MacFan, Dmehus and Drummingman can’t prevent abuse. | ::::::::::# The wiki grows to the point where MacFan, Dmehus and Drummingman can’t prevent abuse. | ||
::::::::::#You are more highly trusted on other wikis (not test ones or ones that just give out high trust permissions). | ::::::::::# You are more highly trusted on other wikis (not test ones or ones that just give out high trust permissions). | ||
::::::::::#You show that you can perform actions similar to steward actions without significant opposition. | ::::::::::# You show that you can perform actions similar to steward actions without significant opposition. | ||
::::::::::However IMO, 1 is so close to being met, that I’d probably support. Though I do consider this discussion to be pre discussion canvassing, you are a pretty highly qualified candidate, who inevitably I would have to support. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 06:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | ::::::::::However IMO, 1 is so close to being met, that I’d probably support. Though I do consider this discussion to be pre discussion canvassing, you are a pretty highly qualified candidate, who inevitably I would have to support. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 06:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Amend [[Test Wiki:No open proxies]] to include [[Wikipedia: colocation providers|colocation providers]]== | ==Amend [[Test Wiki:No open proxies]] to include [[Wikipedia: colocation providers|colocation providers]]== | ||
| Line 398: | Line 397: | ||
:{{done}} as this is pretty uncontroversial and doesn’t warrant further discussion. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 16:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC) | :{{done}} as this is pretty uncontroversial and doesn’t warrant further discussion. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 16:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Addition of interface admin protection level== | == Addition of interface admin protection level == | ||
I am proposing that interface administrator protection is added to help protect sensitive interface pages, i.e the sidebar and sitenotice pages, and also for protecting highly used templates. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 06:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | I am proposing that interface administrator protection is added to help protect sensitive interface pages, i.e the sidebar and sitenotice pages, and also for protecting highly used templates. [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 06:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
