Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
→Possible close?: Reply
Zippybonzo (talk | contribs) (→Proposal: Non steward CheckUser & Oversight/Suppressors: new section) |
Zippybonzo (talk | contribs) (→Possible close?: Reply) |
||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
:I agree [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 05:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC) | :I agree [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 05:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 15:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC) | :I agree. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 15:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Filed pull request. So {{partially done}} [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 13:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
====Support proposed close and involved closure==== | ====Support proposed close and involved closure==== | ||
| Line 437: | Line 438: | ||
::::{{done}} [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 04:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC) | ::::{{done}} [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 04:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Proposal: Non steward CheckUser & Oversight/Suppressors == | ==Proposal: Non steward CheckUser & Oversight/Suppressors== | ||
Hello, I am proposing non-steward check user and oversight/suppressors, whilst there isn't an active need for extra check users or suppressors as of now, in my opinion, if there are enough people able to perform the role, then they should be in the role as it's always better to have more people when you don't need them but to have none when you need them. Because the two roles are quite high trust, I am proposing the following requirements for each role. | Hello, I am proposing non-steward check user and oversight/suppressors, whilst there isn't an active need for extra check users or suppressors as of now, in my opinion, if there are enough people able to perform the role, then they should be in the role as it's always better to have more people when you don't need them but to have none when you need them. Because the two roles are quite high trust, I am proposing the following requirements for each role. | ||
| Line 443: | Line 444: | ||
Checkuser: | Checkuser: | ||
# Basic understanding of IP addresses and ranges and CIDR syntax. | #Basic understanding of IP addresses and ranges and CIDR syntax. | ||
# Pass a vote on the community portal with either 80% support, or 70-80% at a steward's discretion. | #Pass a vote on the community portal with either 80% support, or 70-80% at a steward's discretion. | ||
# Have a good understanding of account security. | #Have a good understanding of account security. | ||
# Performing unnecessary or abusive checks will result in having your access revoked. | #Performing unnecessary or abusive checks will result in having your access revoked. | ||
Suppressor: | Suppressor: | ||
# Basic understanding of suppression criteria. | #Basic understanding of suppression criteria. | ||
# Pass a vote on the community portal with either 80% support, or 70-80% at a steward's discretion. | #Pass a vote on the community portal with either 80% support, or 70-80% at a steward's discretion. | ||
# Have a good understanding of account security. | #Have a good understanding of account security. | ||
I believe that this is also a way for users to gain additional trust. | I believe that this is also a way for users to gain additional trust. | ||
