389
edits
Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
→Oppose: Not weak per my added comments
(→General comments: + procedural and added comment) |
(→Oppose: Not weak per my added comments) |
||
| Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
* {{Oppose}} –[[User:CrazyFisherman|CrazyFisherman]] ([[User talk:CrazyFisherman|talk]]) 20:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC) Granting rights is exactly the purpose of the bureaucrat flag; too many rights directly for bureaucrats aren't necessary | * {{Oppose}} –[[User:CrazyFisherman|CrazyFisherman]] ([[User talk:CrazyFisherman|talk]]) 20:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC) Granting rights is exactly the purpose of the bureaucrat flag; too many rights directly for bureaucrats aren't necessary | ||
**That is true, however crats (indirectly) already have access to Interwiki through the interwiki admin user right. This proposal eliminates the need for crats to grant '''themselves''' a right to edit interwikis. [[User:PorkchopGMX (on the go)|PorkchopGMX (on the go)]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX (on the go)|talk]]) 20:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | **That is true, however crats (indirectly) already have access to Interwiki through the interwiki admin user right. This proposal eliminates the need for crats to grant '''themselves''' a right to edit interwikis. [[User:PorkchopGMX (on the go)|PorkchopGMX (on the go)]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX (on the go)|talk]]) 20:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
* '''Weak''' {{Oppose}}, as it's not really suited to bureaucrats. I suppose this could be added to the <code>sysop</code> toolkit. On the other hand, we may desire users have some higher level of competency. Not really sure what the best approach is here. On the one hand, this would reduce multiple hats being collected. On the other, I'm not certain adding to <code>sysop</code> is the best idea. One other idea might be to have only Stewards grant interwiki administrator? [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC) | * <s>'''Weak'''</s> {{Oppose}}, as it's not really suited to bureaucrats. I suppose this could be added to the <code>sysop</code> toolkit. On the other hand, we may desire users have some higher level of competency. Not really sure what the best approach is here. On the one hand, this would reduce multiple hats being collected. On the other, I'm not certain adding to <code>sysop</code> is the best idea. One other idea might be to have only Stewards grant interwiki administrator? [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
*:I don't think interwiki needs to be restricted to stewards. Interwiki rights are much less important than import, delete, block, etc. rights. I proposed the right be moved into bureaucrat because that was technically the status quo and therefore it would be the least controversial move. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 18:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC) | *:I don't think interwiki needs to be restricted to stewards. Interwiki rights are much less important than import, delete, block, etc. rights. I proposed the right be moved into bureaucrat because that was technically the status quo and therefore it would be the least controversial move. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 18:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
*::[[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]], it's not really related to the <code>bureaucrat</code> role, ''at all'', though. ''That'''s why I don't support it. For context, the reason why it's restricted to Stewards on Miraheze is because of the potential to have malicious sites bypass the Content Security Policy. So, it's not a completely innocuous right. In this respect, the <code>block</code> and <code>delete</code> user rights are much more innocuous than the <code>interwiki</code> user right; importing ''can'' have potential issues, so I'd probably say this would be on par with ''that'', or maybe slightly ''above'' even. Above it would be interface administrator. My preference would be to delete a lot of the unneeded user groups that are below the <code>sysop</code> group, and just have one <code>testgroup</code> and maybe <code>autopatrolled</code> and <code>confirmed</code>. The rest could probably be turfed. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 01:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC) | *::[[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]], it's not really related to the <code>bureaucrat</code> role, ''at all'', though. ''That'''s why I don't support it. For context, the reason why it's restricted to Stewards on Miraheze is because of the potential to have malicious sites bypass the Content Security Policy. So, it's not a completely innocuous right. In this respect, the <code>block</code> and <code>delete</code> user rights are much more innocuous than the <code>interwiki</code> user right; importing ''can'' have potential issues, so I'd probably say this would be on par with ''that'', or maybe slightly ''above'' even. Above it would be interface administrator. My preference would be to delete a lot of the unneeded user groups that are below the <code>sysop</code> group, and just have one <code>testgroup</code> and maybe <code>autopatrolled</code> and <code>confirmed</code>. The rest could probably be turfed. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 01:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
