Test Wiki:Request for permissions/Archive 12

From Test Wiki
Revision as of 03:49, 15 July 2022 by Q8j (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{RFPHeader}} == LisafBia == {{UserLinks|LisafBia}} {{RfPBtn}} <!-- Do not edit above lines --> '''Requested right:''' Interface Admin <!-- Add the right you are requesting here (Administrator/Bureaucrat) --> <!-- Place Yes/No in each of the boxes below (like so: [Yes]) to affirm you consent with what follows them. If placed No in any box or left blank, then it may result in your request taking longer to process due to discussion as to why you do not agree with the state...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:RFPHeader

LisafBia

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Interface Admin

  • [y] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [y] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [y] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: I request this group to develop Twinkle and similar tools and make the common.css/js file better. Thank you. LisafBia (talk) 14:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Questions
  • What is the need for Twinkle here?
  • When you say "make the common/css.js file better", what exactly do you mean?
  • When you say "similar tools", what tools are you talking about?

Please answer these questions. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 17:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

I'd like to have Twinkle here just for testing all the anti-vandalism functions it can use. Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 17:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
@Trayfel: similar tools = gadgets

LisafBia (talk) 18:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

  • I wonder if there's any need to edit MediaWiki:Common.js to develop/test out Twinkle. I think loading an equivalent library script via the user's common.js will do. --Dragoniez (talk) 19:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

  Withdrawn LisafBia (talk) 19:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Seiyena

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Bureaucrat

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 20:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

  Not done - As per Demhus comment, you can be assigned Bureaucrat in a further week or two's time.Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 08:19, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Lalo

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right:

  • [ ] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [ ] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [ ] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: Lalo (talk) 20:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


  •   On hold Please place yes/no in boxes above.--Q8j (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Lalo: Pinging, also, please specify the user right. Thanks, Zippybonzo (talk) 17:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
  1. REDIRECT Special:MyLanguage/Template:Not done You can make new request if need be.--Q8j (talk) 01:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Seiyena

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Bureaucrat

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: Since it has now been a week since I was promoted to admin and there have been no issues, I'd like to have bureaucrat agin please. Thanks! Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 21:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)   Not done, you have once again triggered filter 88. I would remove admin, but I will leave that to the other bureaucrats. Zippybonzo (talk) 21:32, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Let me reconsider Zippybonzo (talk) 21:35, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I wrote down the circumstances of the latest trigger on my talk page, as an explanation. Maybe that would help. Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 21:34, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

  On hold waiting for other Bureaucrat/Steward opinions. (Please see Seiyena’s TP) Zippybonzo (talk) 21:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

  Permissions revoked and RFP denied - Hello Seiyena, after seeing this comment, I believe you have reverted to your old ways, which is unfortunate. I think it is fair to say you have used every last bit of our patience. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 00:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
To be honest, I did not know that uploading that image would create any issues here. Like I said on my talk page, I thought no one would even notice since I meant it to be deleted right after uploading. Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 00:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Honestly Seiyena, I do not care for your excuses anymore. You have abused every last resource given to you by us and that, is disappointing. Cheers. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 00:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
I fully agree with Trayfel's decision and will oppose any requests for adminship in a month starting from today. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Regrettably, I have to agree with this. Regarding your indefinite block that MacFan4000 imposed, that, too, I do have endorse, but I would just say, in a similar vein to what NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh expressed above, sixty (60) days from the date on which you were blocked without sockpuppetry, I would be satisfied enough to recommend a conditional block to MacFan4000 in our deliberations and consideration of appeals. Dmehus (talk) 04:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Even if she uses sockpuppet, can we detect that? I doubt, seeing Sierpnia case. And, if she's allowed to edit own TP for appeal, how do you conclude whether she should be unblocked or not? If you see numerous lies she made and numerous promises she broke, you can't say "based on her words", can you?
Let me say this again. How many times do we have to be betrayed trust we put on her?--Q8j (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Syunsyunminmin

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right:

  • [y] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [y] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [y] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: Hi, I would like to request Admin. Thank you Syunsyunminmin (talk) 08:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

  Done. Q8j (talk) 08:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)