Test Wiki:Request for permissions

From Test Wiki
Revision as of 15:43, 9 June 2022 by Sav (talk | contribs) (→‎Seiyena: re)

Template:RFPHeader

Seiyena

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Administrator and Bureaucrat

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: Hi. I am back from my "break" and would like to request my rights back. As far as I know, I don't have any restrictions on needing steward approval or having to wait for either one of these. I promise to be responsible here and obey all the rules from now on. Thank you. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 16:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Ping @Dmehus or MacFan4000 in case you have any questions or comments. @Seiyena, I strongly advise not triggering filter 88 ever again. Don't say stuff like "Hi f——ts" on talk pages. If a steward objects to any of these rights, consider it denied. Thanks. 3PPYB6 (talk) 17:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, I will absolutely stay-- away from setting off that filter. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 17:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Just a note, I did bring this up to MacFan4000 (and Dmehus) yesterday on Miraheze but never got a reply. https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User_talk:MacFan4000

Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 17:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

  On hold I recommend getting the Steward's opinion. LisafBia (talk) 17:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment: I think it's good that 3PPYB6 sent notification to stewards and LisafBia put this on hold.
    • On the other hand, yes, there is no steward's decision prohibiting her from having admin(If I'm not missing something). MacFan4000 blocked her for 3 weeks but didn't make new decision prohibiting her from having permissions. Also, on Miraheze, Dmehus(I verified that "Dmehus" there and Dmehus here are the same person) said "No objections to you having permissions on Test Wiki". It can be considered as steward's approval.
    • Unless steward decides otherwise or BC objects in 48 hours, I think she should be granted admin. @3PPYB6 and LisafBia:What do you think?--Q8j (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • I think we should keep it at trial. LisafBia (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @Q8j – If no steward openly rejects anything here, we can procedurally give Seiyena administrator. However, bureaucrat needs steward approval (see here). Thanks. 3PPYB6 (talk) 22:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

I didn't realize that Dmehus had replied on MacFan's Miraheze talk page after I pinged him. So since he said he doesn't have a problem with me having admin and bureaucrat, does that mean I can have those permissions granted right away? Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 22:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

  Done. but bureaucart in later day. 想舞花 (talk) 03:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
So can I request bureaucrat in a few days? Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 03:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
@Seiyena: 1 day later.--想舞花 (talk) 03:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Sounds good with me. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 03:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
@想舞花: I do not feel Seiyena is capable of holding the bureaucrat permission as of yet. @Dmehus: - can you please provide your input? Thanks. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 17:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Per my question regarding my rights on Miraheze, Dmehus said he wouldn't have any problems with my holding permissions here. https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User_talk:MacFan4000

But I'll let the other bureaucrats and the stewards decide on this. If they want me to wait, then I will wait (and not ask early). I really don't want to cause any more trouble here. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 17:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Seiyena

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Bureaucrat

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: The section above is a bit long so I thought I would put this here. Anyways, I feel that I'm ready to be a bureaucrat here. However, like I said above, I'm okay if others would prefer me to wait a bit. My main reason for asking is so I can give rights to others when they request them here. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 00:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@Seiyena:Why do you need this right? Will you re-use insults against people of a different nationality, race, religion, etc. — Regards, Kazrok4545 Talk 03:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

I will not use any more insults against anyone here. I'd like to be able to help make people admins and bureaucrats when they ask here, and also practice mass-deleting pages. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 03:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

  •   On hold 24 hours passed since you're granted admin.
    • Your question was "I would just like to ask if I am allowed to regain my admin and bureaucrat privileges there right away" and Dmehus said "No objections to you having permissions on Test Wiki.", so there's no steward's restrictions.
    • So, there's no reason that we, BC, can't grant BC. Question remains is that whether she can be trusted enough to have BC.
    • This time, I'm not intended to wait steward's authorization(Of course, if they decide something, I'll do as they say). I put this on hold for 48 hours to listen BC's opinion.
    • 48 hours may be long for you, but please be patient. Also, if BCs don't oppose this, I'm fine with granting BC. But if there is objection, unless there are more support, I have to decline this.
  • --Q8j (talk) 04:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
  Done. Mini14 (talk) 08:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
  1. REDIRECT Special:MyLanguage/Template:Not done and blocked Mini14 as sockpuppet or copycat of 想舞花.--Q8j (talk) 08:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi, since the 48 hour waiting period will end later today, I just wanted to make sure that if anyone wanted to give their thoughts on me becoming a bureaucrat here, they can do so. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 11:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

@Seiyena: Hello, Seiyena. I will be assigning you the permission as I feel you have proven yourself to have changed. I really hope you do not prove us wrong with this decision. All the best. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 12:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Request is   Done. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 12:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Mini14

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right:Bureaucrat

  • [Yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [Yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [Yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments:thanks Mini14 (talk) 04:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

  Done. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 06:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Example

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right:administrator and bureaucract

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: i need use this account doing test Example (talk) 09:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

  Not done Per removing content from Test Wiki:Community portal AlPaD (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

想舞花

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Admin and bureaucract

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments:back 想舞花 (talk) 09:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@想舞花: Hello! User:Mini14 is your? AlPaD (talk) 09:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
@AlPaD: mini14 is my Neighbors and classmates.--想舞花 (talk) 09:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
  Done. Make another request for the bureaucrat. LisafBia (talk) 09:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

想舞花

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right:bureaucrat

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments:thanks 想舞花 (talk) 09:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

  Not done Rights revoked and user retired. AlPaD (talk) 10:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

DarkMatterMan4500

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Bureaucrat

  • [Yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [Yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [Yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: I want to test out other features such as the import tools, so I can do a test delete if I wanted to. I am aware that's not really saying much, but I should be able to do so, as the importing page is only accessible to bureaucrats only. Of course, I'll be responsible with the importing. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

  Done. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 15:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Seiyena

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Administrator and bureaucrat

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: I had my permissions removed for editing filter 88 even after being told not to. However, I thought that since I was just adding my alt account names to the filter and not removing anything, it would be okay. But I will not edit that filter at all any more. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 00:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

@NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh: Can you see this request? AlPaD (talk) 04:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
@AlPaD: I oppose regranting adminship and cratship for at least two weeks from today.
@LisafBia: You did so without even notifying me, without any formal request on this page. Would you mind explain why you thought regranting adminship for someone who did not keep their promise to behave, not once but multiple times, right after another user revoked their permissions is a good idea?
@Seiyena: I said my last warning needs to be "broadly construed", and you promised not to edit the filter in question. You failed to keep a promise, so I see no reason to believe you a second time, at least not in a few weeks.
I request that a bureaucrat, other than LisafBia and me, close this discussion and enact accordingly, which means to grant/revoke permissions or to leave things as is (temporary adminship). NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
  Not done for now. AlPaD (talk) 16:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Should I wait two weeks to ask again? Or could I keep admin for those two weeks and assuming everything goes well, ask for bureaucrat in two weeks? Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 17:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I believe that there shouldn't specific time. AlPaD (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Seiyena

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Administrator

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: I would like to ask for admin for right now, but since I did go back on my word about editing the filter, I will wait two weeks to ask for bureaucrat. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 06:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

I meant to say that you should be granted cratship nor adminship in no sooner than two weeks. Your temporary adminship was not revoked simply because I don't want to revert another user's change without consultation, like what they did to me. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
I have a bit of a proposal. Firstly, Seiyena, I hope you do realize that you should never have edited filter 88, even if it was just to add your alternate accounts. You could have used the Community portal to suggest your change, then an unrelated user can make that change for you. Let alone, you shouldn't have even deliberately triggered it. While a majority of these triggers are false positives, some of them are totally unacceptable. I wish I could say that if you say a racially insensitive/derogatory comment like "hi f——ts" or "hi f——rs" or "hi r——ds" ever again then you would be blocked. But let's not do that as the abuse filter is to guide, not to punish you.
Instead, let's do this: adminship and cratship will be re-granted via a bureaucrat-by-bureaucrat discussion in which we will determine your worthiness of the rights. If you trigger filter 88 deliberately (note that this is different from a false positive), your adminship and cratship will be revoked until bureaucrats can further decide on whether or not you still deserve the rights.
If we can prove that time and time again you have triggered filter 88 with intention and in bad faith, you will be sent to the community portal where you will face the stewards. They will figure out what to do next.
I hope you do realize that at this point you have been trusted and abused that trust we have placed in you. I'll trust you until I can't, but from now on you're walking on some paper-thin ice. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 21:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Also, this is just my proposal, and if anyone objects then we won't use this. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 21:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
That sounds like a fair plan to me, and I do understand that I absolutely should stay away from either editing or triggering that filter. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 21:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

So should I still wait two weeks before being given admin and bureaucrat? Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 15:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Seiyena

Template:UserLinks Template:RfPBtn Requested right: Administrator and Bureaucrat

  • [yes] I am familiar with all of Test Wiki's policies, and understand that important rules will be communicated to me as necessary through obtrusive message boxes.
  • [yes] I agree that I am entirely responsible for all actions done under this account, including actions performed under this account by someone other than myself.
  • [yes] I agree that if I misuse the sysop/bureaucrat tools, my access might be revoked and I may be banned from Test Wiki without prior warning.

Other comments: I'd like to test more things that admins and bureaucrats do. If we go with the proposal above, could I please go ahead and have my powers back? I really will stay away from editing filter 88. -Seiyena The darkness is coming for you 09:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

No. I don't feel comfortable giving you any advanced rights after the recent problem. Not to mention that you intentionally triggered AF#88 again. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
All right. I will wait a few more days before asking again. The darkness is coming for you 14:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
  Not done - As per NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh's comment. @Seiyena: Please also see my comment on your talk page. Regards, Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 15:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC).
Retrieved from "https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Test_Wiki:Request_for_permissions&oldid=23062"