Test Wiki:Community portal

From Test Wiki
Revision as of 23:21, 18 April 2022 by Dmehus (talk | contribs) (→‎In regards to User:Seiyena.: + close)

Latest comment: 18 April 2022 by Dmehus in topic In regards to User:Seiyena.
The community portal is Test Wiki's village pump and noticeboards, two-in-one.

Archives: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12


Mind if I suggest something?

Latest comment: 18 April 20227 comments6 people in discussion

Instead of having your access to the admin tools after 1 month goes by without activity, why not just have it be 3 months instead? I'd say that 1 month is a bit too short, and I'm not sure how one month would be enough of a reason. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 13:51, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Supports

  Support I like this idea, and can't see any drawbacks to it. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 16:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Support I think it should be extended. LisafBia (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Support Per nom. I am one (as you are three) 23:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Support I absolutely agree with that! AlPaD (talk) 14:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oppose

  Oppose We're giving out adminship and 'cratship as if they were candies. Isn't that good enough? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 10:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
It's definitely good but it would save bureaucrats some work by not having to re-add user rights so often and also save everyone else the hassle of having to ask for the rights again after just a short one-month hiatus. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 12:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

CheckUser request

Latest comment: 17 April 20221 comment1 person in discussion

These 2 users are blocked intefinite on Chinese Wikipedia and locked on Wikimedia foundation, this action is suspected and 想舞花 had approved 七海娜娜米's request for adminship even though another bureaucrat had rejected it. Thanks! AlPaD (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Special:AbuseFilter/52

Latest comment: 18 April 20223 comments2 people in discussion

The third line should have been & !page_id == 702. Currently it's checking for spam edits on TW:RFP... NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 10:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pinging @Dmehus. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can't admins edit the filters themselves? I know that on another wiki that was possible. Just saying. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 19:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

In regards to User:Seiyena.

Latest comment: 18 April 20228 comments4 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This has already been addressed, by another user. I strongly loathe any sort of 'community block' for good-faith, even marginally good-faith users. Block, CheckUser, rinse, and repeat has been tried, and I'm not keen to go back there, at least not yet. This is a Steward-managed affair, and I did suggest it might've been too soon to grant bureaucrat. In any case, I'm going to work on having Arcversin deploy the Miraheze global abuse filter to mitigate this. I don't believe an indefinite suspension of bureaucrat; I would rather manage this a month at a time. If bureaucrat revocation is required, I'll do that. Dmehus (talk) 23:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi all, I hope this message finds you well. After noticing more and more reports regarding Seiyena, I have come to the decision to cast a vote regarding this user.

This user has made several racist, homophobic and frankly, disgusting comments on this Wiki. They have had chance after chance to stop this behavior and have even been given Administrator permissions after every "apology". Frankly, I think they are unfit to be a sysop on this Wiki and I am here to ask for the community's opinion on a blacklist for requesting permissions. Pinging @Dmehus: & @MacFan4000: for their opinion. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 19:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Question: Is this blacklist intended to be temporary or indefinite? Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 19:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Considering the amount of abuse you have contributed towards this Wiki, I would say if granted, the RFP blacklist would be indefinite. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 19:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Trayfel: Hello! Maybe for a while she should be blocked from some namespaces and have lower rights (autopatrol, researcher etc). AlPaD (talk) 19:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
I like AlPad's idea, and wouldn't be against a temporary blacklist, to be honest. I don't like the indefinite idea, but do feel that maybe temporary is warranted. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 19:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
With all due regards Sieyena, this isn't down to you. @AlPaD: I agree, I think an indefinite blacklist from sysop permissions with the exception of Seiyena being allowed Autopatrol and researcher. Thoughts? Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 19:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

I know that I can't make this decision by myself, but I do think I should at least be able to offer my views on this matter. My proposal is a temporary blacklist from requesting permissions together with a partial block from the Talk namespace and maybe the Request Permissions page. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 21:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Test_Wiki:Community_portal&oldid=21619"