Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by Codename Noreste (talk) to last revision by Sav Tag: Rollback |
→Idea Lab: Deputy Stewards: Reply |
||
| Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
:Note: This would replace the NSS and AFA roles. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC) |
:Note: This would replace the NSS and AFA roles. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC) |
||
:{{support}}, seems like a useful addition. [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 01:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC) |
:{{support}}, seems like a useful addition. [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 01:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC) |
||
:Seems largely unnecessary to me. It appears to be a combination of abuse filter admin and NSS, one of which is already being deprecated. The only difference that I noticed between the proposed role and stewardship is the use of the CheckUser tool. If someone is trustworthy and active enough to attain this right, they are most certainly able to simply become a steward. If the steward team is in need of additional membership/support and finds their duties too burdensome, I know multiple users that have expressed an interest if the need arose. |
|||
:TL;DR: If the stewards need help, let’s elect more stewards not make an additional unneeded role. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 01:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC) |
|||
