Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
LisafBia (talk | contribs)
402 edits
LisafBia (talk | contribs)
402 edits
Line 199: Line 199:
Currently, for rights that are very high trust and delegated from Stewards or the community (such as NSS and AFA), those rights can be re-requested at any time. I would propose removing that clause, but I would like to hear the ideas of others: What should happen if a person holding one of those rights loses them due to inactivity and then re-requests them? [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Currently, for rights that are very high trust and delegated from Stewards or the community (such as NSS and AFA), those rights can be re-requested at any time. I would propose removing that clause, but I would like to hear the ideas of others: What should happen if a person holding one of those rights loses them due to inactivity and then re-requests them? [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)



⚫
:{{o}} As @[[User:Tester|Tester]] said, it would be better to request permission again without a community vote. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)


===Discussion===
===Discussion===
Line 205: Line 205:


{{Oppose}}, if the user already got approval to get those rights in the first place (i.e. they are trusted to handle sensitive role(s)), why over-complicate things just because of inactivity? If someone has a concern, they can just share it when the user re-requests the rights. There may be some exceptions but I'd otherwise support keeping the clause in. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 15:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}, if the user already got approval to get those rights in the first place (i.e. they are trusted to handle sensitive role(s)), why over-complicate things just because of inactivity? If someone has a concern, they can just share it when the user re-requests the rights. There may be some exceptions but I'd otherwise support keeping the clause in. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 15:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

⚫
{{o}} As @[[User:Tester|Tester]] said, it would be better to request permission again without a community vote. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://testwiki.wiki/wiki/Test_Wiki:Community_portal"