Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Line 116: Line 116:
*{{support}} for community discussions, at least. As far as I know we don't really send out inactivity notices and rather resort to grace periods for inactive admins, in which case they already receive a notification that way. [[User:EPIC|EPIC]] ([[User talk:EPIC|talk]]) 20:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
*{{support}} for community discussions, at least. As far as I know we don't really send out inactivity notices and rather resort to grace periods for inactive admins, in which case they already receive a notification that way. [[User:EPIC|EPIC]] ([[User talk:EPIC|talk]]) 20:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
*:Yeah, for clarity, on the inactivity notices, I ''wasn't'' proposing to mass add every Test Wiki user to the newsletter distribution list, but rather just allowing for users to have been added without having to explicitly subscribe. If recently active users were added to the list (i.e., those not currently blocked who were active in the last ninety (90) calendar days or so), that would also be permitted, but we wouldn't want to actively ''encourage'' that and probably should be a steward (unless they've given explicit permission on Discord, IRC, or on-wiki to be added. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 20:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
*:Yeah, for clarity, on the inactivity notices, I ''wasn't'' proposing to mass add every Test Wiki user to the newsletter distribution list, but rather just allowing for users to have been added without having to explicitly subscribe. If recently active users were added to the list (i.e., those not currently blocked who were active in the last ninety (90) calendar days or so), that would also be permitted, but we wouldn't want to actively ''encourage'' that and probably should be a steward (unless they've given explicit permission on Discord, IRC, or on-wiki to be added. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 20:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

== SecurePoll permission set ==

Hi all:

I'm glad to see we've enabled the SecurePoll extension. I'm wondering, though, to reduce the number of testing permission groups, if we might want to either:

* A. Add the <code>securepoll-create-poll</code> and <code>securepoll-edit-poll</code> user rights into either of:
: 1. The <code>bureaucrat</code> user group (would require an additional level of trust)
: 2. The <code>sysop</code> user group
* B. Merge the two permissions into the <code>interwiki-admin</code> user group, then rename the group Election and Interwiki Administrator (<code>election-interwiki-admin</code>)
* C. Maintain the <code>election-admin</code> user group, but instead merge the <code>interwiki-admin</code> permissions into either of:
: 1. The <code>bureaucrat</code> user group (would require an additional level of trust)
: 2. The <code>sysop</code> user group
* D. Something else? Elaborate.

What are your thoughts?

Cheers,
<br />[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 20:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)