Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Line 199: Line 199:
I {{Support}} the removal of this clause from the inactivity policy. I believe that an inactivity removal should be treated as a normal removal and hence require another community vote to regain their position. [[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]]) 15:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
I {{Support}} the removal of this clause from the inactivity policy. I believe that an inactivity removal should be treated as a normal removal and hence require another community vote to regain their position. [[User:VancityRothaug|VancityRothaug]] ([[User talk:VancityRothaug|talk]]) 15:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)


{{Oppose}}, if the user already got approval to get those rights in the first place, why over-complicate things just because of inactivity? If someone has a concern, they can just share it when the user re-requests the rights. There may be some exceptions but I'd otherwise support keeping that in. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 15:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}, if the user already got approval to get those rights in the first place (i.e. they are trusted to handle sensitive role(s)), why over-complicate things just because of inactivity? If someone has a concern, they can just share it when the user re-requests the rights. There may be some exceptions but I'd otherwise support keeping the clause in. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 15:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)