User talk:X: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: 9 June 2023 by X in topic cocopuffwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
→‎C: new section
Line 1: Line 1:
== F-TW (discussion cannot take place on For-Test Wiki) ==
==F-TW (discussion cannot take place on For-Test Wiki)==


Myht seems to have been unreliable lately. I'm not too sure what's going on, nor if Matt is aware, but myht.org has gone down with 500s for 2 days in a row. Perhaps if we have another system administrator who can reasonably spend on it, it may be worth considering switching hosting method and domain for FTW. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Myht seems to have been unreliable lately. I'm not too sure what's going on, nor if Matt is aware, but myht.org has gone down with 500s for 2 days in a row. Perhaps if we have another system administrator who can reasonably spend on it, it may be worth considering switching hosting method and domain for FTW. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
:I agree. Site outages have became quite frequent. I have emailed Matttest about these issues and volunteered to become a system administrator, but have not heard back yet. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 01:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
:I agree. Site outages have became quite frequent. I have emailed Matttest about these issues and volunteered to become a system administrator, but have not heard back yet. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 01:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


== About protection ==
==About protection==


It is not right to take away the user's right to object with an amendment. Please be careful to [[w:WP:ASSUME|assume good faith]]. --[[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
It is not right to take away the user's right to object with an amendment. Please be careful to [[w:WP:ASSUME|assume good faith]]. --[[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:What do you mean? The user abused their talk page while blocked (added the word foo), so I protected it from editing so they won't abuse it. Whats the problem? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 13:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:What do you mean? The user abused their talk page while blocked (added the word foo), so I protected it from editing so they won't abuse it. Whats the problem? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 13:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:: This was still not an inappropriate change. As I said, assume good faith. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::This was still not an inappropriate change. As I said, assume good faith. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:::I did assume good faith. Twice. I told the user to be careful when I granted administrator rights the second time, and they still abused them. They then abused their talk page, (adding the word Foo over it, [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), so I temp protected it for 2 weeks to stop abuse and allow for appeals in two weeks. This is an appropriate action, and is justified. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:::I did assume good faith. Twice. I told the user to be careful when I granted administrator rights the second time, and they still abused them. They then abused their talk page, (adding the word Foo over it, [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), so I temp protected it for 2 weeks to stop abuse and allow for appeals in two weeks. This is an appropriate action, and is justified. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::: Thanks for your good care and quick blocking of this user I can really appreciate that;-) I agree with LisafBia that the user should have the possibility to appeal. In case of abuse, access can be blocked, but protection is not necessary. :-) [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:::Thanks for your good care and quick blocking of this user I can really appreciate that;-) I agree with LisafBia that the user should have the possibility to appeal. In case of abuse, access can be blocked, but protection is not necessary. :-) [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::::There '''was''' abuse ([https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Username&oldid=27168 here]), that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::::: I know it. Thanks again for your concern. Should the user continue to disrupt instead of consulting about the block, then any admin and crat may revoke access by blocking it. Kind regards, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:::::I know it. Thanks again for your concern. Should the user continue to disrupt instead of consulting about the block, then any admin and crat may revoke access by blocking it. Kind regards, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:::::: Why would we give this user special treatment? Convention is to revoke TPA or protect talk page upon disruptive behavior, which has occurred here. I genuinely don't understand why we wouldn't protect it for a few weeks to let the user think about their actions and to prevent abuse. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::::::Why would we give this user special treatment? Convention is to revoke TPA or protect talk page upon disruptive behavior, which has occurred here. I genuinely don't understand why we wouldn't protect it for a few weeks to let the user think about their actions and to prevent abuse. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:If a user is blocked, their talk page is for '''appeals''' only, and there is no need to wait for more disruption to revoke TPA or protect the talk page. This action was reasonable and preventative, not punitive. I agree with X. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:If a user is blocked, their talk page is for '''appeals''' only, and there is no need to wait for more disruption to revoke TPA or protect the talk page. This action was reasonable and preventative, not punitive. I agree with X. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::I believe the actions were also good and certainly not punitive, and revoking access at that time was also helpful and good. We are now almost a day away, let's see if the user continues to abuse? If yes? Then you can revoke access. I would like to give the user a chance to explain and appeal this blocking. I really understand your concerns, With collegial regards [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 15:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::I believe the actions were also good and certainly not punitive, and revoking access at that time was also helpful and good. We are now almost a day away, let's see if the user continues to abuse? If yes? Then you can revoke access. I would like to give the user a chance to explain and appeal this blocking. I really understand your concerns, With collegial regards [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 15:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Line 19: Line 19:
::::Sounds good to me. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 15:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::::Sounds good to me. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 15:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)


== hi ==
==hi==


hello, how are you? --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 02:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
hello, how are you? --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 02:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Line 38: Line 38:
are you coming back online on irc? --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 03:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
are you coming back online on irc? --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 03:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


== cocopuff wiki ==
==cocopuff wiki==


are you still active on cocopuff wiki? i sent you a message? --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 23:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
are you still active on cocopuff wiki? i sent you a message? --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 23:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
:Yep, just finished a Memorial Day party, sorry I am not online. I will join you on IRC in about 30-60 minutes. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 00:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
:Yep, just finished a Memorial Day party, sorry I am not online. I will join you on IRC in about 30-60 minutes. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 00:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)


== IRC ==
==IRC==


im on irc please rejoin --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 16:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
im on irc please rejoin --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 16:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
:{{done}}. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 16:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
:{{done}}. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 16:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)


== cocopuffwiki ==
==cocopuffwiki==


hello, if you are still active on coco puff wiki could you please send me a message there, i have something to ask you @[[User:X|X]] [[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 17:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
hello, if you are still active on coco puff wiki could you please send me a message there, i have something to ask you @[[User:X|X]] [[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 17:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

:Done [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 17:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:22, 9 June 2023

F-TW (discussion cannot take place on For-Test Wiki)

Myht seems to have been unreliable lately. I'm not too sure what's going on, nor if Matt is aware, but myht.org has gone down with 500s for 2 days in a row. Perhaps if we have another system administrator who can reasonably spend on it, it may be worth considering switching hosting method and domain for FTW. Justarandomamerican (talk) 01:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Site outages have became quite frequent. I have emailed Matttest about these issues and volunteered to become a system administrator, but have not heard back yet. X (talk) 01:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

About protection

It is not right to take away the user's right to object with an amendment. Please be careful to assume good faith. --LisafBia (talk) 13:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean? The user abused their talk page while blocked (added the word foo), so I protected it from editing so they won't abuse it. Whats the problem? X (talk) 13:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
This was still not an inappropriate change. As I said, assume good faith. LisafBia (talk) 13:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I did assume good faith. Twice. I told the user to be careful when I granted administrator rights the second time, and they still abused them. They then abused their talk page, (adding the word Foo over it, here), so I temp protected it for 2 weeks to stop abuse and allow for appeals in two weeks. This is an appropriate action, and is justified. X (talk) 14:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your good care and quick blocking of this user I can really appreciate that;-) I agree with LisafBia that the user should have the possibility to appeal. In case of abuse, access can be blocked, but protection is not necessary. :-) Drummingman (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
There was abuse (here), that's why I protected for 2 weeks, and after that they can appeal. Is this okay? X (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I know it. Thanks again for your concern. Should the user continue to disrupt instead of consulting about the block, then any admin and crat may revoke access by blocking it. Kind regards, Drummingman (talk) 14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Why would we give this user special treatment? Convention is to revoke TPA or protect talk page upon disruptive behavior, which has occurred here. I genuinely don't understand why we wouldn't protect it for a few weeks to let the user think about their actions and to prevent abuse. X (talk) 14:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
If a user is blocked, their talk page is for appeals only, and there is no need to wait for more disruption to revoke TPA or protect the talk page. This action was reasonable and preventative, not punitive. I agree with X. Justarandomamerican (talk) 14:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I believe the actions were also good and certainly not punitive, and revoking access at that time was also helpful and good. We are now almost a day away, let's see if the user continues to abuse? If yes? Then you can revoke access. I would like to give the user a chance to explain and appeal this blocking. I really understand your concerns, With collegial regards Drummingman (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, let's see. Thank you, Justarandomamerican (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good to me. X (talk) 15:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

hi

hello, how are you? --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 02:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Doing well. How are you? X (talk) 02:08, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


good do you do irc? --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 02:08, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes. X (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


whats ur username --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 02:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Globe. I joined your wiki by the way. It’s cool! X (talk) 02:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


dm me Cocopuff2018 on irc --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 02:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Done. X (talk) 02:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

are you coming back online on irc? --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 03:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

cocopuff wiki

are you still active on cocopuff wiki? i sent you a message? --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 23:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yep, just finished a Memorial Day party, sorry I am not online. I will join you on IRC in about 30-60 minutes. X (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

IRC

im on irc please rejoin --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 16:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Done. X (talk) 16:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

cocopuffwiki

hello, if you are still active on coco puff wiki could you please send me a message there, i have something to ask you @X Cocopuff2018 (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Done X (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply