User talk:CrazyFisherman/Archive: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 6 May 2021 by CrazyFisherman in topic "blocked for spam" notices
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
archived |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<div align="center"> |
<div align="center"> |
||
<big> |
<big> |
||
'''This user is inactive''' |
'''This user is mainly inactive''' |
||
</big> |
</big> |
||
<br> |
<br> |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== [[user:URIScott07924464|URIScott07924464]] == |
== [[user:URIScott07924464|URIScott07924464]] == |
||
Why did you block that user and state to review the abuse log for evidence? When I checked abuse log there is no logs matching your claim. They have no contributions to the test wiki at all. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Ronja</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Ronjapatch|u]] • [[User talk:Ronjapatch|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ronjapatch|c]])''</small> 19:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC) |
Why did you block that user and state to review the abuse log for evidence? When I checked abuse log there is no logs matching your claim. They have no contributions to the test wiki at all. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Ronja</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Ronjapatch|u]] • [[User talk:Ronjapatch|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ronjapatch|c]])''</small> 19:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
== "blocked for spam" notices == |
|||
Hi, please don't put "blocked for spam" notices on spambot user pages. It's unnecessary and creates a lot of extra pages. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 19:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:Okay, I am not going to place them anymore. --[[User:CrazyFisherman|CrazyFisherman]] ([[User talk:CrazyFisherman|talk]]) 10:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:43, 15 May 2021
This user is mainly inactive
Archive of User talk:CrazyFisherman
Pleaso do not edit this page!
blocked-spam and protect blocked users` user page
How about mark this kind of edits as bot-edit? Zhuofan WuCien años de soledad 13:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- I am going to do it in the future. Thanks! --Morneo06 (talk) 17:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Why did you block that user and state to review the abuse log for evidence? When I checked abuse log there is no logs matching your claim. They have no contributions to the test wiki at all. ~ Ronja (u • t • c) 19:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
"blocked for spam" notices
Hi, please don't put "blocked for spam" notices on spambot user pages. It's unnecessary and creates a lot of extra pages. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 19:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I am not going to place them anymore. --CrazyFisherman (talk) 10:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)