User talk:Cocopuff2018: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: 11 January 2021 by Q8j in topic Question
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Q8j (talk | contribs)
m Protected "User talk:Cocopuff2018": Excessive vandalism: If you want to remove this protection, please let me know. ([Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Delete=Allow only bureaucrats] (indefinite) [Protect=Allow only bureaucrats] (indefinite))
Q8j (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


While the motivation for your edits on [[User talk:Proof]] is understandable, the [[:meatball:SignalToNoiseRatio|SignalToNoiseRatio]] of that conversation has long dropped below the level where continued engagement is likely to produce a constructive dialogue. As this matter involves private evidence it would be best for all parties involved if further discussion were restricted to e-mail or other private off-wiki channels. Best, [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]]) 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
While the motivation for your edits on [[User talk:Proof]] is understandable, the [[:meatball:SignalToNoiseRatio|SignalToNoiseRatio]] of that conversation has long dropped below the level where continued engagement is likely to produce a constructive dialogue. As this matter involves private evidence it would be best for all parties involved if further discussion were restricted to e-mail or other private off-wiki channels. Best, [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]]) 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

== Question ==
*Shall I protect page User:Cocopuff2018 (create=BC)?
*May I change moving-protection level for User talk:Cocopuff2018 to BC only?--[[User:Q8j|Q8j]] ([[User talk:Q8j|talk]]) 19:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:00, 11 January 2021

Advice

While the motivation for your edits on User talk:Proof is understandable, the SignalToNoiseRatio of that conversation has long dropped below the level where continued engagement is likely to produce a constructive dialogue. As this matter involves private evidence it would be best for all parties involved if further discussion were restricted to e-mail or other private off-wiki channels. Best, Fast - ZoomZoom (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Question