Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 419: | Line 419: | ||
:{{support}} Don't see why not. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 17:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
:{{support}} Don't see why not. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 17:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
:What purpose does it serve? Can you elaborate? [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
:What purpose does it serve? Can you elaborate? [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
::Given that stewards are considered the non-test administrators on this wiki (similarly, bureaucrats have some access to non-test user rights), and that stewards can also modify abuse filters with restricted actions (same goes for abuse filter administrator[s]), I think it would be reasonable to also include the bureaucrat user rights in the steward user group (and retain the bureaucrat user group for non-stewards). For example, on the English Wikibooks (where I'm an administrator), that project's administrators had the reviewer (<code>editor</code>) user group in addition to <code>sysop</code>, which was redundant given that administrators over there can review edits and pages. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|talk]]) 00:45, 27 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Template:Permissions granted]]== |
==[[Template:Permissions granted]]== |
||
| Line 425: | Line 426: | ||
:I was thinking if a shorter name like Template:Granted would make things concise, since the "permissions" part would be implied anyways. Then one could do something like <nowiki>{{granted|admin}}</nowiki>. Neat idea to combine all the templates into one, though! <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 17:46, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
:I was thinking if a shorter name like Template:Granted would make things concise, since the "permissions" part would be implied anyways. Then one could do something like <nowiki>{{granted|admin}}</nowiki>. Neat idea to combine all the templates into one, though! <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 17:46, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks! I strongly agree with the new template name you specified and your reasons for it. Thus, I will proceed with that name. [[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
::Thanks! And yes, I strongly agree with the new template name you specified and your reasons for it. Thus, I will proceed with that name. [[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
