Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 416: | Line 416: | ||
For transparency purposes and because stewards are highly trusted, I propose that we add most, if not all of the user rights from the bureaucrat permission and place them into the steward toolset, but we still retain the bureaucrat permission for non-stewards. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|talk]]) 21:36, 24 November 2025 (UTC) |
For transparency purposes and because stewards are highly trusted, I propose that we add most, if not all of the user rights from the bureaucrat permission and place them into the steward toolset, but we still retain the bureaucrat permission for non-stewards. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|talk]]) 21:36, 24 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
:{{support}} Don't see why not. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 17:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:What purpose does it serve? Can you elaborate? [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Given that stewards are considered the non-test administrators on this wiki (similarly, bureaucrats have some access to non-test user rights), and that stewards can also modify abuse filters with restricted actions (same goes for abuse filter administrator[s]), I think it would be reasonable to also include the bureaucrat user rights in the steward user group (and retain the bureaucrat user group for non-stewards). For example, on the English Wikibooks (where I'm an administrator), that project's administrators had the reviewer (<code>editor</code>) user group in addition to <code>sysop</code>, which was redundant given that administrators over there can review edits and pages. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|talk]]) 00:45, 27 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Template:Permissions granted]]== |
==[[Template:Permissions granted]]== |
||
| Line 421: | Line 425: | ||
:I was thinking if a shorter name like Template:Granted would make things concise, since the "permissions" part would be implied anyways. Then one could do something like <nowiki>{{granted|admin}}</nowiki>. Neat idea to combine all the templates into one, though! <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 17:46, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
:I was thinking if a shorter name like Template:Granted would make things concise, since the "permissions" part would be implied anyways. Then one could do something like <nowiki>{{granted|admin}}</nowiki>. Neat idea to combine all the templates into one, though! <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px cyan">[[User:Tester|Tester]]</span> ([[User_talk:Tester|ᴛ]]•[[Special:Contributions/Tester|ᴄ]]) 17:46, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks! And yes, I strongly agree with the new template name you specified and your reasons for it. Thus, I will proceed with that name. [[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
