Test Wiki talk:Blocks and bans: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: 9 February by Renamed user 58678 in topic Suspected bot accounts
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Community bans==
==Community bans==

Others may disagree with me, but I believe it follows that if the community delegates the power to impose bans to Stewards, they have that ability themselves regardless of its policy basis, so I disagree with the information on them being replaced with a 'the community may ''guide'' the stewards' esque statement. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 13:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Others may disagree with me, but I believe it follows that if the community delegates the power to impose bans to Stewards, they have that ability themselves regardless of its policy basis, so I disagree with the information on them being replaced with a 'the community may ''guide'' the stewards' esque statement. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 13:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
:I agree, this is simply common sense. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 14:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


==Suspected bot accounts==
:I agree, this is simply common sense. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#3383ff;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 14:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
We need a new statement on this page about not blocking suspected bot accounts. This is because we have had users, especially me, blocking newly registered users because of a generic first and last name visible on their user talk pages. This statement needs to affirm users about how these users could potentially be good-faith ones. Additionally, this statement should be rest assured that if any of these users come to spam our wiki, the abuse filter bot will deal with them. [[User:Renamed user 58678|Faithful]] ([[User talk:Renamed user 58678|talk]]) 20:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:10, 26 October 2025

Community bans

[edit source]

Others may disagree with me, but I believe it follows that if the community delegates the power to impose bans to Stewards, they have that ability themselves regardless of its policy basis, so I disagree with the information on them being replaced with a 'the community may guide the stewards' esque statement. Justarandomamerican (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree, this is simply common sense. X (talk + contribs) 14:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Suspected bot accounts

[edit source]

We need a new statement on this page about not blocking suspected bot accounts. This is because we have had users, especially me, blocking newly registered users because of a generic first and last name visible on their user talk pages. This statement needs to affirm users about how these users could potentially be good-faith ones. Additionally, this statement should be rest assured that if any of these users come to spam our wiki, the abuse filter bot will deal with them. Faithful (talk) 20:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply