Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
From Test Wiki
Content deleted Content added
| Line 276: | Line 276: | ||
==Proposal to exempt <code>autopatrolled</code> from [[Test Wiki:Inactivity|inactivity policy]]== |
==Proposal to exempt <code>autopatrolled</code> from [[Test Wiki:Inactivity|inactivity policy]]== |
||
{{discussion top|1=After the discussion was ongoing for roughly one week, there is clear consensus to add the autopatrolled user right to the autoconfirmed permission, and for the autochecked and autoreviewed user groups to be merged with autopatroller and patroller user groups, respectively. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#A1000E">talk</span>]])</span> 17:53, 26 April 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
I'd like to recommend that we exempt the <code>autopatrolled</code> from [[Test Wiki:Inactivity|inactivity policy]]. The permission is ''not'' an advanced permission nor does it geant permissions with security implications warranting an removal where a user is inactive. Its only utility is to reduce the need to patrol revisions of users who are not autopatrolled. Test Wiki is not a content wiki; therefore, there is no need to have users regularly patrolling revisions. |
I'd like to recommend that we exempt the <code>autopatrolled</code> from [[Test Wiki:Inactivity|inactivity policy]]. The permission is ''not'' an advanced permission nor does it geant permissions with security implications warranting an removal where a user is inactive. Its only utility is to reduce the need to patrol revisions of users who are not autopatrolled. Test Wiki is not a content wiki; therefore, there is no need to have users regularly patrolling revisions. |
||
| Line 301: | Line 301: | ||
::::[[User:X|X]], oh, yes, I definitely agree we should keep some of the user groups below <code>sysop</code> for testing of user group management and testing of scripts and such. I just think if we can consolidate some of the largely duplicative groups (<code>reviewer</code> into <code>patroller</code>, for example), it'll clean things up a bit. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 17:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC) |
::::[[User:X|X]], oh, yes, I definitely agree we should keep some of the user groups below <code>sysop</code> for testing of user group management and testing of scripts and such. I just think if we can consolidate some of the largely duplicative groups (<code>reviewer</code> into <code>patroller</code>, for example), it'll clean things up a bit. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 17:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC) |
||
:I support the first version. [[User:Sidrat al-Muntaha|Sidrat al-Muntaha]] ([[User talk:Sidrat al-Muntaha|talk]]) 19:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC) |
:I support the first version. [[User:Sidrat al-Muntaha|Sidrat al-Muntaha]] ([[User talk:Sidrat al-Muntaha|talk]]) 19:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC) |
||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
==Notice to IAs removed for inactivity== |
==Notice to IAs removed for inactivity== |
||
