Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: 5 August 2019 by Mateo K 01 in topic Comment
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(comment)
Line 90: Line 90:


===Neutral===
===Neutral===
== Comment ==
Don't hold it against me, but I noticed something in the context of the Steward/Sysadmin candidacies. Both users requested after the admin status the bureaucrat rights relatively quickly (a few days). After this very short time, both want to exercise extended functions. What I'm trying to say is, it's obvious too early, wait and see. --[[User:Mateo K 01|Mateo K 01]] ([[User talk:Mateo K 01|talk]]) 20:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:10, 5 August 2019

The community portal is Test Wiki's all-in-one help, proposal, and on-wiki action request venue.

Archives: 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09

Error while trying to create Abuse Filter

Hello, there is an error while I try to create an abuse filter that detects vandalism with the word "poop", and I would want a filter that detects the word and then disallow the edit, while I tried to create the Abuse Filter, there appeared error text "Internal error", blablabla and please can another create that Abuse Filter, and use this while creating the filter:

  • Filter description: "Poop" vandalism
  • Conditions:
!"confirmed" in user_groups & (
 article_namespace == 0 & (
  edit_delta < 300 & (
   (
    ccnorm(added_lines) rlike "\bP+([\.\,\/\?\>\<\!\@\#\$\%\^\&\*\(\)\_\+\-\=\{\}\|\[\]\\\:\;\']?)O\1?O+\1?P+\1?(E*\1?S+\1?|E+\1?R+\1?S*\1?|E*\1?D+\1?|I\1?N+\1?G+\1?)?\b"
   ) 
   & (!old_wikitext irlike "\bP+OO+P*(E+R+S*|E*D+|E*S+|I+N+G+)?\b"
   )
  )
 )       
)
  • Notes: none
  • Flags: private filter
  • Actions caused while an editor trips the filter: Disallow the edit

- PSL600 (Talk) 11:56, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We don't currently have the setup to use ccnorm as it belongs with another anti-spoofing extension that we don't use. -- Void Whispers 15:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Suggestions

Here, have I some suggestions to the Test Wiki:

  • Change default skin from Refreshed to Vector/Monobook
  • Add some more images and templates from Wikipedia, so more people come to this wiki
  • More abuse filters

Please comment below - PSL600 (Talk) 18:11, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As a rule of thumb, only have abuse filters for issues that are prevalent and recurring. -- Void Whispers 21:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok, but I would have default skin changed from "Refreshed" to "Vector" or "Monobook", because I do not like the "Refreshed" skin, "Vector" is better than Refreshed and more cooler, "Refreshed" is orange and have some harder text to read - PSL600 (Talk) 06:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I support a change of default skin to "Vector", I believe that "Refreshed" is difficult to use due to the absence of some sidebar links such as "Special pages". Bonnedav (talk) 06:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can't login to Phabricator

When I try to login to Phabricator using my wiki account, I get this:

@Bonnedav: We've fixed the issue, you should be able to login to phab now. -- Void Whispers 17:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Void: Thank you, I was able to create an account but I am not receiving the verification email. Is it being blocked? I already checked spam. Bonnedav (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Bonnedav: I've sent an email manually that contains the verification link. The subject of the email should be "Phabricator email validation". -- Void Whispers 23:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Void: It worked, thank you. Bonnedav (talk) 23:08, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

cannot log in to the phacibrator

@Void: I cannot log in to the Phacibrator on the test wiki, pleas can you help me to log in there please ? PSL600 (send message) 18:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you tell me what specific issue you are having? Is there an error code? Does your password not work? What is going on? -- Void Whispers 00:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can't login to Phabricator

I can't use my testwiki's username and password to login the Phabricator.Wildly boy (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You need to login using the "Login with MediaWiki" option at the bottom right of the login options. -- Void Whispers 14:22, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wildly boy for Steward

Hello,I want to use the checkuser and oversight to help me combating vandalism.But these right only given to steward.So I want to request the steward so that combating vandalism.Thanks.Wildly boy (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Sounds good. EggRoll97 (talk) 11:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Suport User good. Gustave London (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gustave London for Steward

I have a few edits, but I think I could be a good steward. I even know how to install MediaWiki, and I know how to use GitHub and phabricathor. So I think I'll be able to handle the wiki issues.I know how to use the check user supervision tool in other wikis so it looks like it will work here. Gustave London (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Supports

Oppose

Neutral

Trusted user, too soon to be requesting steward.--JJBullet18:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

JJBullet for sysadmin

I am self requesting sysadmin because i have been active on the testwiki, added some new features such as "adminstats" and "wikibreak", i am an active and trusted member of the testwiki and currently an admin & 'crat, if given the sysadmin right i will maje this wiki better by adding some new features, doing routine gried prevention & help out when needed, thank you for your time.--JJBullet18:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Supports

Oppose

Neutral

Comment

Don't hold it against me, but I noticed something in the context of the Steward/Sysadmin candidacies. Both users requested after the admin status the bureaucrat rights relatively quickly (a few days). After this very short time, both want to exercise extended functions. What I'm trying to say is, it's obvious too early, wait and see. --Mateo K 01 (talk) 20:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]